Two Damascus Document Fragments and Mistaken Identities: The Mingling of Some Qumran Cave 4 and Cave 6 Fragments
Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves....
| Опубликовано в: : | Dead Sea discoveries |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2021
|
| В: |
Dead Sea discoveries
|
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Damaskusschrift (Qumrantexte)
/ Provenienzforschung
/ Höhle 4, Qumran
/ 4Q269
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | HD Ранний иудаизм |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
PAM 41.734
B Provenance B 6Q15 B Qumran Cave 4 B Qumran / Höhle 6 B Damascus Document B Qumran Cave 6 |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves. Also PAM 41.734 does not clearly distinguish between all Cave 4 and Cave 6 fragments. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5179 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Dead Sea discoveries
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685179-20201001 |