Two Damascus Document Fragments and Mistaken Identities: The Mingling of Some Qumran Cave 4 and Cave 6 Fragments

Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves....

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:Dead Sea discoveries
Autor principal: Tigchelaar, Eibert J. C. 1959- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Brill 2021
Em: Dead Sea discoveries
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Damaskusschrift (Qumrantexte) / Provenienzforschung / Höhle 4, Qumran / 4Q269
Classificações IxTheo:HD Judaísmo primitivo
Outras palavras-chave:B PAM 41.734
B Provenance
B 6Q15
B Qumran Cave 4
B Qumran / Höhle 6
B Damascus Document
B Qumran Cave 6
Acesso em linha: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves. Also PAM 41.734 does not clearly distinguish between all Cave 4 and Cave 6 fragments.
ISSN:1568-5179
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Dead Sea discoveries
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685179-20201001