Two Damascus Document Fragments and Mistaken Identities: The Mingling of Some Qumran Cave 4 and Cave 6 Fragments

Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves....

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Dead Sea discoveries
Auteur principal: Tigchelaar, Eibert J. C. 1959- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2021
Dans: Dead Sea discoveries
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Damaskusschrift (Manuscrits de la Mer Morte) / Art / Höhle 4, Qumran / 4Q269
Classifications IxTheo:HD Judaïsme ancien
Sujets non-standardisés:B PAM 41.734
B Provenance
B 6Q15
B Qumran Cave 4
B Qumran / Höhle 6
B Damascus Document
B Qumran Cave 6
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Abstract Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves. Also PAM 41.734 does not clearly distinguish between all Cave 4 and Cave 6 fragments.
ISSN:1568-5179
Contient:Enthalten in: Dead Sea discoveries
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685179-20201001