A Point by Point Response to Donald Wiebe: A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract A point by point response to Wiebe’s ‘Manifesto’, mostly in support of the ‘methodological naturalism’—with added precautions on the current use of the term ‘science’. A philosophy for the study of religion is called for, with an epistemological range that caters for collective methodologie...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jensen, Jeppe Sinding 1951- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2021
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2021, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 89-94
Further subjects:B definitions theory-dependent
B Reification
B analytical value of concepts
B the concept of ‘science’
B social reality and life-worlds
B Methodological Naturalism
B theoretical object
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1748662414
003 DE-627
005 20210219042542.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210219s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15700682-12341497  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1748662414 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1748662414 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)140880852  |0 (DE-627)623108437  |0 (DE-576)178745405  |4 aut  |a Jensen, Jeppe Sinding  |d 1951- 
109 |a Jensen, Jeppe Sinding 1951-  |a Jensen, Jeppe S. 1951-  |a Sinding-Jensen, Jeppe 1951-  |a Sinding Jensen, Jeppe 1951- 
245 1 2 |a A Point by Point Response to Donald Wiebe: A Manifesto for the Scientific Study of Religion 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract A point by point response to Wiebe’s ‘Manifesto’, mostly in support of the ‘methodological naturalism’—with added precautions on the current use of the term ‘science’. A philosophy for the study of religion is called for, with an epistemological range that caters for collective methodologies and social ontologies; respects the analytic distinction between ‘subject matter’ and ‘theoretical object’—and, ultimately, the theory-ladenness of all talk about ‘religion’. Naturalism is not about givens in the study of meaningful human behavior. 
601 |a Wiebe, Donald 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a the concept of ‘science’ 
650 4 |a Methodological Naturalism 
650 4 |a social reality and life-worlds 
650 4 |a definitions theory-dependent 
650 4 |a Reification 
650 4 |a analytical value of concepts 
650 4 |a theoretical object 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Method & theory in the study of religion  |d Leiden : Brill, 1989  |g 33(2021), 1, Seite 89-94  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)34189656X  |w (DE-600)2069397-7  |w (DE-576)100668399  |x 1570-0682  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:89-94 
856 |u https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/280220239/A_Point_by_Point_Response_to_Donald_Wiebe_A_Manifesto_for_the_Scientific_Study_of_Religion_AM.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341497  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/mtsr/33/1/article-p89_7.xml  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3862752364 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1748662414 
LOK |0 005 20210219042542 
LOK |0 008 210219||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-02-18#1776463B0018B8FD8426E8D957E98B0604C0426C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL