Nudging for others’ sake: An ethical analysis of the legitimacy of nudging healthcare workers to accept influenza immunization
A core idea underlying nudging is that it helps individuals to achieve their own goals, yet many nudges actually aim at collective goals or specifically target the benefit of others. An example is nudging healthcare workers to be vaccinated against influenza. I distinguish between self-regarding nud...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2021]
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 35, Issue: 2, Pages: 143-150 |
IxTheo Classification: | NCH Medical ethics |
Further subjects: | B
influenza immunization of healthcare personnel
B Harm B ‘as judged by themselves’ standard B Beneficence B other-regarding nudges B Solidarity B nudging |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1745992707 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211006152123.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210129s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12819 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1745992707 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1745992707 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hoven, Mariette van den |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nudging for others’ sake |b An ethical analysis of the legitimacy of nudging healthcare workers to accept influenza immunization |
264 | 1 | |c [2021] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A core idea underlying nudging is that it helps individuals to achieve their own goals, yet many nudges actually aim at collective goals or specifically target the benefit of others. An example is nudging healthcare workers to be vaccinated against influenza. I distinguish between self-regarding nudges, which primarily benefit the nudgee, and other-regarding nudges, which mainly benefit others, and argue that the default justificatory reason to legitimize self-regarding nudges, namely the ‘as judged by themselves’ standard, does not apply and that we need to look for other justifications. I examine several possible moral justifications to support strong other-regarding nudges, namely beneficence, the harm principle and solidarity. | ||
650 | 4 | |a ‘as judged by themselves’ standard | |
650 | 4 | |a Beneficence | |
650 | 4 | |a Harm | |
650 | 4 | |a influenza immunization of healthcare personnel | |
650 | 4 | |a nudging | |
650 | 4 | |a other-regarding nudges | |
650 | 4 | |a Solidarity | |
652 | |a NCH | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 35(2021), 2, Seite 143-150 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g pages:143-150 |
856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12819 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12819 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12819 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3844437355 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1745992707 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211006152123 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210129||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |