A Case Study of the Reception of Aristotle in Early Protestantism: The Platonic Idea of the Good in the Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics

The present article examines the philosophical ethics of Protestants teaching in higher education during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and their reception of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1.6. Two theses are illustrated. First, the survey of fourteen commentaries shows clear paralle...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Herreros, Alfonso (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Έκδοση: Iter Press [2020]
Στο/Στη: Renaissance and reformation
Έτος: 2020, Τόμος: 43, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 41-69
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo:KAG Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1500-1648, Μεταρρύθμιση, Ανθρωπισμός, Αναγέννηση
KAH Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1648-1913, Νεότερη Εποχή
KDD Ευαγγελική Εκκλησία
NCA Ηθική 
VA Φιλοσοφία
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Higher Education
B Christian Philosophy
B Protestantism
B Aristotle, 384-322 B.C
B Christian Ethics
Διαθέσιμο Online: Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση
Volltext (doi)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:The present article examines the philosophical ethics of Protestants teaching in higher education during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and their reception of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1.6. Two theses are illustrated. First, the survey of fourteen commentaries shows clear parallels with the medieval interpretation of the Ethics, which the Protestant authors creatively expanded. Thus, the continuity of Protestantism with the earlier tradition of Christian philosophy is substantiated in this specific case for a representative group of authors. Second, over against the prejudices according to which Protestantism simply censured ethics and subsumed it into moral theology, this article shows that, in truth, Aristotle was still the fundamental philosophical reference in a topic as central as the definition of happiness, and that the Platonic "theological" alternative was not considered appropriate for a philosophical discipline.
ISSN:2293-7374
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Renaissance and reformation
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.33137/rr.v43i3.35301