Dialogue as the Conditio Humana: a Critical Account of Dmitri Nikulin’s Theory of the Dialogical
Dmitri Nikulin is one of the few contemporary philosophers to have devoted books to the topic of dialogue and the dialogical self, especially in the last fifteen years. Yet his work on dialogue and the dialogical has received scant attention by philosophers, and this neglect has hurt the ongoing dev...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
[2020]
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2020, Volume: 59, Issue: 4, Pages: 779-792 |
| Further subjects: | B
Dialogue
B Agency B Dialogicality B Dmitri Nikulin B The dialogical self |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1744983976 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210119134753.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210119s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11841-019-00746-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1744983976 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1744983976 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Warfield, Bradley S. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dialogue as the Conditio Humana |b a Critical Account of Dmitri Nikulin’s Theory of the Dialogical |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Dmitri Nikulin is one of the few contemporary philosophers to have devoted books to the topic of dialogue and the dialogical self, especially in the last fifteen years. Yet his work on dialogue and the dialogical has received scant attention by philosophers, and this neglect has hurt the ongoing development of contemporary philosophical work on dialogicality. I want to address this lacuna in contemporary philosophical scholarship on dialogicality and suggest that, although Nikulin’s account is no doubt insightful and thought-provoking, it is problematic for two main reasons: first, his account fails to recognize the proper relationship between dialogue and agency; and second, his enumeration of the necessary and sufficient conditions for dialogue contains conceptual inconsistencies. | ||
| 601 | |a Conditio humana | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Agency | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dialogicality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dialogue | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dmitri Nikulin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a The dialogical self | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 59(2020), 4, Seite 779-792 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g pages:779-792 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-019-00746-8 |x Resolving-System |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3839338379 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1744983976 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210119134753 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||