Does God Know that the Flower in My Hand Is Red? Avicenna and the Problem of God’s Perceptual Knowledge

(i) God is omniscient; therefore, He knows that ‘the flower in my hand is red.’ (ii) If God knows that ‘the flower in my hand is red,’ then He knows it perceptually (i.e., His knowledge is explained by the theory of perception). (iii) God does not know anything perceptually. It is clear that the set...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zadyousefi, Amirhossein (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands [2020]
In: Sophia
Year: 2020, Volume: 59, Issue: 4, Pages: 657-693
Further subjects:B Avicenna
B God’s contingency
B God’s materiality
B God’s perceptual knowledge
B God’s affection
B God’s knowledge of particulars
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1744983917
003 DE-627
005 20210119134749.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210119s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-019-0730-9  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1744983917 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1744983917 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Zadyousefi, Amirhossein  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Does God Know that the Flower in My Hand Is Red? Avicenna and the Problem of God’s Perceptual Knowledge 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a (i) God is omniscient; therefore, He knows that ‘the flower in my hand is red.’ (ii) If God knows that ‘the flower in my hand is red,’ then He knows it perceptually (i.e., His knowledge is explained by the theory of perception). (iii) God does not know anything perceptually. It is clear that the set of propositions (i)-(iii) form an inconsistent triad. This is one of four problems with which Avicenna was engaged concerning God's knowledge of particulars, which I call the problem of perceptual knowledge (PPK). In order to solve PPK and three other problems, Avicenna has developed a theory concerning God’s knowledge of particulars. Secondary literature around Avicenna’s theory of God’s knowledge of particulars has mostly directed its attention to give an account of Avicenna’s positive theory rather than the problems which that theory was designed to solve. But this paper will not do the same thing as this secondary literature. In contrast, in this paper, I will concentrate on the characterization of one of the problems, i.e., PPK, because of which Avicenna has presented his positive theory of God’s knowledge of particulars. In short, this paper aims to show why Avicenna deems explaining God’s knowledge of, say, the redness of a flower, via his accepted theory of perception as problematic. In this regard, I will extract three versions of PPK based on Avicenna's philosophy and through it will shed some light on Avicenna’s theory of God’s knowledge of particulars. 
601 |a Avicenna 
601 |a Problem 
601 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Avicenna 
650 4 |a God’s affection 
650 4 |a God’s contingency 
650 4 |a God’s knowledge of particulars 
650 4 |a God’s materiality 
650 4 |a God’s perceptual knowledge 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 59(2020), 4, Seite 657-693  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:2020  |g number:4  |g pages:657-693 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-019-0730-9  |x Resolving-System 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 383933828X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1744983917 
LOK |0 005 20210119134749 
LOK |0 008 210119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw