A scientific discipline: the persistence of a delusion?
In my response to Martin and Wiebe's academic "confession", I try to show that there is a major inconsistency in their argument. This inconsistency resides within their partial and therefore biased application of universal unconscious mechanisms that constrain the human mind, where th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Společnost
[2012]
|
| In: |
Religio
Year: 2012, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: [39]-42 |
| Further subjects: | B
philosophy of science
B Religious Studies B cognitive science of religion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 174381657X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220630101408.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210104s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 11222.digilib/125395 |2 hdl | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)174381657X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP174381657X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1082507849 |0 (DE-627)847534537 |0 (DE-576)45545065X |4 aut |a Kundt, Radek |d 1981- | |
| 109 | |a Kundt, Radek 1981- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A scientific discipline |b the persistence of a delusion? |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2012] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In my response to Martin and Wiebe's academic "confession", I try to show that there is a major inconsistency in their argument. This inconsistency resides within their partial and therefore biased application of universal unconscious mechanisms that constrain the human mind, where the application should have been complete. Their argument should have been directed at all sciences or at science in general in order for it to be sound, and not particularly at Religious Studies. This would result in the argument that any scientific discipline is a delusion, which is an outcome Martin and Wiebe do not hold, as they make science a sine qua non for their own argument. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive science of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Studies | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religio |d Brno : Společnost, 1993 |g 20(2012), 1, Seite [39]-42 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)728517531 |w (DE-600)2687025-3 |w (DE-576)401035689 |x 2336-4475 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2012 |g number:1 |g pages:[39]-42 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kommentar zu |a Martin, Luther H., 1937 - |t Religious studies as a scientific discipline |d 2012 |w (DE-627)1743816545 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kommentar in |a Martin, Luther H., 1937 - |t Why the possible is not impossible but is unlikely |d 2012 |w (DE-627)174381660X |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/125395 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |
| 936 | u | w | |d 20 |j 2012 |e 1 |h [39]-42 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3829982488 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 174381657X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210104162316 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||