Demokrati og jødisk fundamentalisme i Israel

This study - Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel and Democracy - examines the political concepts and practice of the haredi (ultra-orthodox) political parties, Shas and United Torah Judaism. It tries to establish their traditionalist concept of legitimate political power and its distinctions compared to...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paludan, Peter Steensgaard (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Danish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Univ. [2000]
In: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Year: 2000, Volume: 37, Pages: 3-31
Further subjects:B Fundamentalisme
B Ultra-ortodoks
B Haredi
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1743266561
003 DE-627
005 20230707142809.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201218s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c
024 7 |a 10.7146/rt.v0i37.2624  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1743266561 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1743266561 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a dan 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Paludan, Peter Steensgaard  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Demokrati og jødisk fundamentalisme i Israel 
264 1 |c [2000] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This study - Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel and Democracy - examines the political concepts and practice of the haredi (ultra-orthodox) political parties, Shas and United Torah Judaism. It tries to establish their traditionalist concept of legitimate political power and its distinctions compared to modern concepts. Basing itself to a large extent on the writings of Rabbi Eliezer Menahem Shahk and the “Lithuanian” haredi daily Yated Neeman, the article investigates the haredi understanding of freedom and democracy versus traditional Jewish law (halakhah), focusing on both haredi theoretical explanations of the concepts and on their actual political practice. It especially examines the haredi attitudes as regards three subjects: issues concerning a possible Israeli constitution, basic laws, and the function of the high court as a constitutional court. Hereby the differences between the haredi understanding and use of the term democracy and the modern liberal concept are pointed out. The last part of the article focuses on the electoral basis of haredi power, the growth of haredi communities by natural population increase, new haredi immigrants, new returnees to tradition, and the ability of in particular Shas to enlist voters from traditional (but non-orthodox) economically weak Sephardic circles. The article points to weaknesses in this power base which could in the future create problems for the haredi parties in their attempt to preserve the “status quo”, the balance between secular and religious in Israeli public life. 
601 |a Demokratie 
650 4 |a Fundamentalisme 
650 4 |a Haredi 
650 4 |a Ultra-ortodoks 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift  |d °Arhus : Univ., 1982  |g 37(2000), Seite 3-31  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)684969882  |w (DE-600)2649785-2  |w (DE-576)358413109  |x 1904-8181  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2000  |g pages:3-31 
856 |u https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/download/2624/2273  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2624  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.7146/rt.v0i37.2624  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 37  |j 2000  |h 3-31 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3827126975 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1743266561 
LOK |0 005 20201218140638 
LOK |0 008 201218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL