Benjamin Hoadly, Samuel Clarke, and the Ethics of the Bangorian Controversy: Church, State, and the Moral Law
The Bangorian controversy has been described as ‘the most bitter ideological conflict of the [eighteenth] century’ (J.C.D. Clark). However, while its impact is widely recognised, there are few studies dedicated to the controversy itself. Moreover, the figure at the centre of it all—Benjamin Hoadly,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
[2020]
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 11 |
| Further subjects: | B
ethical rationalism
B Samuel Clarke B Bangorian controversy B early English Enlightenment B Low and High Church Anglicanism B religious conformity laws B Church and state B Conscience B Benjamin Hoadly B moral and political theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1741226104 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210127111314.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201126s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel11110599 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1741226104 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1741226104 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1218612908 |0 (DE-627)1733995137 |4 aut |a Daniel, Dafydd Mills |d 1982- | |
| 109 | |a Daniel, Dafydd Mills 1982- |a Daniel, Dafydd Edwards Mills 1982- |a Daniel, Dafydd E. Mills 1982- |a Daniel, Dafydd 1982- |a Daniel, D. M. 1982- |a Daniel, D. E. M. 1982- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Benjamin Hoadly, Samuel Clarke, and the Ethics of the Bangorian Controversy |b Church, State, and the Moral Law |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The Bangorian controversy has been described as ‘the most bitter ideological conflict of the [eighteenth] century’ (J.C.D. Clark). However, while its impact is widely recognised, there are few studies dedicated to the controversy itself. Moreover, the figure at the centre of it all—Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor—has not always been taken seriously. Such scholars as Norman Sykes, G.R. Cragg, and B.W. Young have dismissed Hoadly as an opportunistic ‘political bishop’, rather than an adept theological thinker. By contrast, this article demonstrates that Hoadly’s Bangorian writings were embedded within the ethical rationalist moral theology of Isaac Newton’s friend, and defender against Gottfried Leibniz, Samuel Clarke. As a follower of Clarke, Hoadly objected to the doctrine of apostolic succession, and to the existence of religious conformity laws in Church and state, because they prevented Christianity from being what he thought it ought to be: a religion of conscience. | ||
| 601 | |a Benjamin | ||
| 601 | |a Hoadly, Benjamin | ||
| 601 | |a Clarke, Samuel | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Bangorian controversy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Benjamin Hoadly | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Low and High Church Anglicanism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Samuel Clarke | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Church and state | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conscience | |
| 650 | 4 | |a early English Enlightenment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethical rationalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral and political theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a religious conformity laws | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 11(2020,11) Artikel 599 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2020 |g number:11 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/599/pdf?version=1606280937 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/599 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11110599 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2020 |e 11 |y 11(2020,11) Artikel 599 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3813476839 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1741226104 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201126161156 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||