A national-scale typology of orientations to religion poses new challenges for the cultural evolutionary study of religious groups

Religious groups differ in theology, ritual, and modes of self-governance. However, the extent to which such differences capture the variation of religious individuals remains unclear. Latent Profile Analysis offers a powerful statistical method for obtaining typologies from the response profiles of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bulbulia, Joseph 1968- (Author) ; Troughton, Geoffrey 1972- (Author) ; Highland, Benjamin R. (Author) ; Sibley, Chris G. ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge [2020]
In: Religion, brain & behavior
Year: 2020, Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Pages: 239-251
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B New Zealand / Religiosity / Disparity / Religious group / Assessment / Religion / Culture / Theory of evolution
IxTheo Classification:AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AE Psychology of religion
CB Christian life; spirituality
CH Christianity and Society
KBS Australia; Oceania
Further subjects:B Church
B Sect
B New Zealand attitudes and values study
B schismogenesis
B Religion
B Schisms
B LPA
B God
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1741036925
003 DE-627
005 20210806163228.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201125s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/2153599X.2019.1678516  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1741036925 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1741036925 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)174007027  |0 (DE-627)698905385  |0 (DE-576)134843452  |4 aut  |a Bulbulia, Joseph  |d 1968- 
109 |a Bulbulia, Joseph 1968-  |a Bulbulia, Joseph Abdul 1968- 
245 1 2 |a A national-scale typology of orientations to religion poses new challenges for the cultural evolutionary study of religious groups 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Religious groups differ in theology, ritual, and modes of self-governance. However, the extent to which such differences capture the variation of religious individuals remains unclear. Latent Profile Analysis offers a powerful statistical method for obtaining typologies from the response profiles of religious individuals. Here, we draw on a national sample of religiously-identified New Zealanders (N = 1484) and use LPA to obtain typologies for diversity in attitudes to religion as assessed by a combination of religious orientations, fundamentalism, and religious group narcissism/humility. The most parsimonious model recovers five types. To illustrate the importance of this descriptive typology, we evaluate the predictions of a church-sect theory against it. Consistent with church-sect theory, we find a greater density of intrinsic/exclusive types (Fundamentrinsics and X-trinsics) among informal/marginal religious groups and a greater density of extrinsic/inclusive types (Moderinsics and Disaffected) among established/mainstream churches. However, the data also reveal an unexpected feature: about 50% of religious affiliates across both marginal and mainstream Christian groups present as either Questrinsics or Moderinsics. Collectively, our findings illustrate how rigorous descriptive statistical models may combine with national-scale data to evaluate classical theories of religious change, while also raising new explanatory challenges for future evolutionary scholars of religions. 
601 |a Typologie 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a Church 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a LPA 
650 4 |a New Zealand attitudes and values study 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a schismogenesis 
650 4 |a Schisms 
650 4 |a Sect 
652 |a AD:AE:CB:CH:KBS 
689 0 0 |d g  |0 (DE-588)4041915-0  |0 (DE-627)106216899  |0 (DE-576)209047615  |2 gnd  |a Neuseeland 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049428-7  |0 (DE-627)10618704X  |0 (DE-576)209082011  |2 gnd  |a Religiosität 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4283474-0  |0 (DE-627)104341920  |0 (DE-576)210784415  |2 gnd  |a Verschiedenheit 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4177711-6  |0 (DE-627)105346616  |0 (DE-576)209979607  |2 gnd  |a Religiöse Gruppe 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4132339-7  |0 (DE-627)105688487  |0 (DE-576)209634723  |2 gnd  |a Beurteilung 
689 0 5 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049396-9  |0 (DE-627)106187155  |0 (DE-576)209081880  |2 gnd  |a Religion 
689 0 6 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4125698-0  |0 (DE-627)104470348  |0 (DE-576)209578750  |2 gnd  |a Kultur 
689 0 7 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4071051-8  |0 (DE-627)106098683  |0 (DE-576)20918275X  |2 gnd  |a Evolutionstheorie 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1017669449  |0 (DE-627)690393806  |0 (DE-576)35409002X  |4 aut  |a Troughton, Geoffrey  |d 1972- 
700 1 |a Highland, Benjamin R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1053809344  |0 (DE-627)79072121X  |0 (DE-576)409725641  |4 aut  |a Sibley, Chris G.  |d ca. 20./21. Jh. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion, brain & behavior  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, 2011  |g 10(2020), 3, Seite 239-251  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)666852502  |w (DE-600)2624106-7  |w (DE-576)457642572  |x 2153-5981  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:2020  |g number:3  |g pages:239-251 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2019.1678516  |x Resolving-System 
936 u w |d 10  |j 2020  |e 3  |h 239-251 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3812235390 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1741036925 
LOK |0 005 20210806163228 
LOK |0 008 201125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043024  |a AE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043016  |a AD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043768  |a CB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550735845  |a CH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049359  |a KBS 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Assessment,Estimation,Appraisal,Culture,Culture,Culture,Disparity,Disparity,Diversity,Diversity,Diversity (motif),Diversity,New Zealand,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,Religiosity,Religious group,Church group,Theory of evolution,Evolution 
STB 0 0 |a Culture,Culture,Civilisation,Civilisation,Culture,Civilisation (motif),Civilisation,Différence,Différence,Groupe religieux,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religiosité,Théorie de l'évolution,Évaluation,Appréciation,Appréciation 
STC 0 0 |a Cultura,Cultura,Diversidad,Diversidad,Evaluación,Grupo religioso,Religiosidad,Religión,Religión,Religión,Teoría de la evolución 
STD 0 0 |a Cultura,Cultura,Diversità,Diversità,Giudizio,Valutazione,Valutazione,Gruppo religioso,Religione,Religione,Religione,Religiosità,Teoria dell'evoluzione,Evoluzionismo,Evoluzionismo 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,宗教团体,宗教性,文化,演化论,进化论 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,宗教團體,宗教性,文化,演化論,進化論 
STG 0 0 |a Avaliação,Cultura,Cultura,Diversidade,Diversidade,Grupo religioso,Religiosidade,Religião,Religião,Teoria da evolução 
STH 0 0 |a Культура (мотив),Культура,Осуждение,Оценка,Различие (мотив),Различие,Религиозная групировка,Религиозность,Религия,Религия (мотив),Теория эволюции 
STI 0 0 |a Διαφορετικότητα <μοτίβο>,Διαφορετικότητα,Ποικιλομορφία,Ποικιλομορφία (μοτίβο),Εκτίμηση,Αξιολόγηση,Θεωρία της εξέλιξης,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκευτική ομάδα,Θρησκευτικότητα,Πολιτισμός <μοτίβο>,Πολιτισμός,Κουλτούρα,Κουλτούρα (μοτίβο) 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie 
SYG 0 0 |a Aotearoa,Dominion of New Zealand,New Zealand,Nouvelle-Zélande,Aetearo,NZ,New Zealand , Religiösität,Religiösität , Disparität,Unterschiedlichkeit,Andersheit,Anderssein , Bewertung,Einschätzung , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Culture , Abstammungslehre,Deszendenztheorie,Entwicklungstheorie,Evolution 
TIM |a 100019070101_100020241231  |b 1907 - 2024