What constitutes fair shared decision-making in global health research collaborations?

Funders (located primarily in high-income countries) and high-income country researchers have historically dominated decision-making within global health research collaborations: from setting agendas and research design to determining how data are collected and analysed and what happens with finding...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pratt, Bridget (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: 9, Pages: 984-993
IxTheo Classification:NCC Social ethics
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Partnership
B Collaboration
B Fair play
B shared decision-making
B global health research
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1740385896
003 DE-627
005 20211006144811.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201123s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12793  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1740385896 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1740385896 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Pratt, Bridget  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a What constitutes fair shared decision-making in global health research collaborations? 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Funders (located primarily in high-income countries) and high-income country researchers have historically dominated decision-making within global health research collaborations: from setting agendas and research design to determining how data are collected and analysed and what happens with findings and outputs. The ethical principle of shared decision-making has been proposed as a way to help address these imbalances within collaborations and to reduce semicolonial and exploitative forms of global health research. It is important to be clear about what shared decision-making means in order to ensure that it is not done in a tokenistic, shallow way. Thus far, the principle’s content has not been examined and articulated in detail. This paper aims to start the process of delineating a concept of fair shared decision-making as a minimum standard for global health research. Using two hypothetical case examples, the paper will demonstrate that global health research practice is often inconsistent with ideal shared decision-making. In such instances, it can be difficult to decide whether shared decision-making within collaborations is fair. The paper describes how the two cases do not meet criteria for unfair or non-ideal shared decision-making, despite having potentially morally troubling features. The nuances of these examples of research practice help to generate clearer ideas about how to judge fairness in shared decision-making. The paper concludes by presenting ideas about when soft power can be fairly employed between high-income-country and low- and middle-income-country partners and what fair compromise agreements may look like in shared decision-making. 
650 4 |a Collaboration 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Fairness 
650 4 |a global health research 
650 4 |a Partnership 
650 4 |a shared decision-making 
652 |a NCC:NCH 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 34(2020), 9, Seite 984-993  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:9  |g pages:984-993 
856 |u http://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstreams/76e09309-8e99-5be0-a271-bfdaf9b46ff5/download  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12793  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12793  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 381044118X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1740385896 
LOK |0 005 20211006144811 
LOK |0 008 201123||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205283X  |a NCC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Fair play 
STB 0 0 |a Équité,Fairplay,impartialité,Fairplay,impartialité 
STC 0 0 |a Justicia,Fairness,Fairness 
STD 0 0 |a Correttezza 
STE 0 0 |a 公平,公正 
STF 0 0 |a 公平,公正 
STG 0 0 |a Justiça,Fairness,Fairness 
STH 0 0 |a Справедливость 
STI 0 0 |a Δικαιοσύνη,Fair play,Ευ αγωνίζεσθαι,Ίση μεταχείριση 
SYE 0 0 |a Fair play