Communication, reflexivity and harm principle: what might an ideal speech situation look like in responsibility to protect?
Previous accounts of International Relations research have extensively focused on deontological ethics in analysing Responsibility to Protect (R2P). At the same time, discourse ethics - along with Jürgen Habermas’ theory of ideal speech situation - has been overlooked. This article argues that the R...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal of global ethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 26-44 |
Further subjects: | B
Ideal Speech Situation
B Discourse ethics B Responsibility to protect B Humanitarian Intervention B harm principle B cosmopolitan theory B Communicative Action |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 173915231X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20201119124505.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201119s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/17449626.2019.1650098 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)173915231X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP173915231X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Piiparinen, Touko |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Communication, reflexivity and harm principle |b what might an ideal speech situation look like in responsibility to protect? |
264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Previous accounts of International Relations research have extensively focused on deontological ethics in analysing Responsibility to Protect (R2P). At the same time, discourse ethics - along with Jürgen Habermas’ theory of ideal speech situation - has been overlooked. This article argues that the R2P process has gradually moved toward the Habermasian ideal speech situation. The Habermasian approach also provides a useful theoretical framework to understand the new, more inclusive and critical, forums of communication and initiatives set in motion by emerging non-Western norm-entrepreneurs in the R2P process, notably the Responsibility while Protecting (RwP) initiated by Brazil in 2011. From the perspective of discourse ethics, RwP could be understood as a cosmopolitan harm principle designed to manage the potentially harmful side-effects of the application of R2P. The article further argues that, despite the current paradigm shift of norm-entrepreneurship on R2P from deontological ethics to discourse ethics, it has thus far only partially fulfilled the criteria of an ideal speech situation. | ||
601 | |a communicare | ||
650 | 4 | |a Discourse ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Communicative Action | |
650 | 4 | |a cosmopolitan theory | |
650 | 4 | |a harm principle | |
650 | 4 | |a Humanitarian Intervention | |
650 | 4 | |a Ideal Speech Situation | |
650 | 4 | |a Responsibility to Protect | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of global ethics |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 |g 16(2020), 1, Seite 26-44 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)506719197 |w (DE-600)2219472-1 |w (DE-576)378913263 |x 1744-9634 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:26-44 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1650098 |x Resolving-System |
936 | u | w | |d 16 |j 2020 |e 1 |h 26-44 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3807034056 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 173915231X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20201119124505 | ||
LOK | |0 008 201119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Responsibility to protect,R2P,R2P |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Responsabilité de protéger |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Responsabilidad de proteger |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Responsibility to protect,Responsabilità di proteggere,R2P,Responsabilità di proteggere,R2P |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 国家保护责任 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Responsabilidade de proteger |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Обязанность защищать |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Responsibility to Protect,Ευθύνη για προστασία,R2P |
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a R2P,Verantwortung zum Schutz,Schutzverantwortung |