Political efficacy, respect for agency, and adaptive preferences
Serene Khader and Rosa Terlazzo have each recently proposed theories of adaptive preferences (APs) which purport to both respect persons’ agency and provide an effective political tool. While Khader and Terlazzo thus share a similar goal, they take fundamentally different paths in its pursuit: Khade...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2017]
|
| In: |
Journal of global ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 13, Issue: 3, Pages: 326-343 |
| Further subjects: | B
adaptive preferences
B Flourishing B Terlazzo B Autonomy B Khader |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1739119371 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201119090619.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201119s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/17449626.2017.1422530 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1739119371 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1739119371 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Weimer, Steven |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Political efficacy, respect for agency, and adaptive preferences |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Serene Khader and Rosa Terlazzo have each recently proposed theories of adaptive preferences (APs) which purport to both respect persons’ agency and provide an effective political tool. While Khader and Terlazzo thus share a similar goal, they take fundamentally different paths in its pursuit: Khader offers a perfectionist account of APs and Terlazzo an autonomy-based theory. In this paper, I argue first that if it is to adequately respect persons’ agency, a theory of APs should in some way include autonomy considerations. If it is to provide an effective political tool, however, our theory should not be entirely autonomy-based, but include a condition addressing a preference’s compatibility with basic flourishing. The suggestion is thus that it is worth considering the possibility of a ‘mixed,’ rather than exclusively perfectionist or exclusively autonomy-based, theory of APs. I outline two such theories. The first, I argue, does quite well with respect to the political efficacy aim of AP theorizing, but has difficulty satisfying the respect for agency aim. The reverse is true of the second. I conclude by suggesting that respect for agency should in this context take priority over political efficacy and that we therefore should accept the latter of the two theories outlined. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a adaptive preferences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Khader | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Terlazzo | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Flourishing | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of global ethics |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 |g 13(2017), 3, Seite 326-343 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)506719197 |w (DE-600)2219472-1 |w (DE-576)378913263 |x 1744-9634 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:326-343 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2017.1422530 |x Resolving-System |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3806890803 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1739119371 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201119090619 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Aufblühen |