Florenskij and Georg Cantor: naming infinity

It might seem surprising to talk about the relationship between a theologian and a mathematician. One deals with matters of faith while the other deals with hard, logical arguments — or not? The relationship might not seem so surprising if I could, in as non-technical terms as possible, explain Cant...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Melita theologica
Autor principal: Lauri, Josef 1955- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: 2019
En: Melita theologica
Año: 2019, Volumen: 69, Número: 1, Páginas: 11-15
Clasificaciones IxTheo:CD Cristianismo ; Ciencia 
KAJ Época contemporánea
KDF Iglesia ortodoxa 
Otras palabras clave:B Florenskii, P. A. (Pavel Aleksandrovich), 1882-1937 -- Knowledge -- Mathematics
B Florenskii, P. A. (Pavel Aleksandrovich), 1882-1937 -- Criticism and interpretation
B Infinite
B Cantor, Georg, 1845-1918 -- Influence
Descripción
Sumario:It might seem surprising to talk about the relationship between a theologian and a mathematician. One deals with matters of faith while the other deals with hard, logical arguments — or not? The relationship might not seem so surprising if I could, in as non-technical terms as possible, explain Cantor’s theory of infinite sets, the objections raised against it, and what an eminent defender of his theory said. I’ll try to do this in these few minutes, without risking going out of point, because this is basically what Florenskij does in his 1904 paper The symbols of the infinite (An essay on the ideas of G. Cantor) (Italian translation), and on which I was asked to comment for this session.
ISSN:1012-9588
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Melita theologica