Decision analysis approach to risk/benefit evaluation in the ethical review of controlled human infection studies

Risks and benefit evaluation for controlled human infection studies, where healthy volunteers are deliberately exposed to infectious agents to evaluate vaccine efficacy, should be explicit, systematic, thorough, and non-arbitrary. Decision analysis promotes these qualities using four steps: (1) dete...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Yu, Michael (Author) ; Darton, Thomas C. (Author) ; Kimmelman, Jonathan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: 8, Pages: 764-770
IxTheo Classification:NCH Medical ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
Further subjects:B risk and benefit
B vaccine development
B controlled human infection
B Decision Analysis
B research ethics
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1735929352
003 DE-627
005 20211006145305.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201019s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12773  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1735929352 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1735929352 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Yu, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Decision analysis approach to risk/benefit evaluation in the ethical review of controlled human infection studies 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Risks and benefit evaluation for controlled human infection studies, where healthy volunteers are deliberately exposed to infectious agents to evaluate vaccine efficacy, should be explicit, systematic, thorough, and non-arbitrary. Decision analysis promotes these qualities using four steps: (1) determining explicit criteria and measures for evaluation, (2) identifying alternatives to the study, (3) defining the models used to estimate the measures for each alternative, and (4) running the models to produce the estimates and compare the alternatives. In this paper, we describe how decision analysis might be applied by funders and regulators, as well as by others contemplating the use of novel controlled human infection studies for vaccine development and evaluation. 
601 |a Controlling 
650 4 |a controlled human infection 
650 4 |a Decision Analysis 
650 4 |a research ethics 
650 4 |a risk and benefit 
650 4 |a vaccine development 
652 |a NCH:NCJ 
700 1 |a Darton, Thomas C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kimmelman, Jonathan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 34(2020), 8, Seite 764-770  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:8  |g pages:764-770 
856 |u https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/162727/8/1812-hic-outline-v15.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12773  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12773  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 34  |j 2020  |e 8  |h 764-770 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3781837319 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1735929352 
LOK |0 005 20211006145305 
LOK |0 008 201019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw