A Proposal to Augment the Plausibility of William Lane Craig’s Deductive Moral Argument
The plausibility—though not the soundness—of William Lane Craig’s deductive moral argument for God’s existence has been insightfully challenged by David Baggett, who prefers to formulate the argument abductively. This paper proposes a way of couching and defending Craig’s argument so as to avoid the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| In: |
Irish theological quarterly
Year: 2020, Volume: 85, Issue: 4, Pages: 405-420 |
| Further subjects: | B
Ethics
B deductive B Craig B abductive B Apologetics B Moral Argument |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1735720097 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201016095743.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201016s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0021140020948379 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1735720097 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1735720097 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Breitenbach, Zachary |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Proposal to Augment the Plausibility of William Lane Craig’s Deductive Moral Argument |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The plausibility—though not the soundness—of William Lane Craig’s deductive moral argument for God’s existence has been insightfully challenged by David Baggett, who prefers to formulate the argument abductively. This paper proposes a way of couching and defending Craig’s argument so as to avoid the potholes Baggett identifies and preserve the value of the deductive form of the argument. Central to this proposal is justifying key criteria that any adequate ontological foundation for objective moral values and duties must possess, highlighting key insights in the history of moral apologetics that support these criteria. Defending the argument in this way both avoids the sting of Baggett’s critiques and offers what amounts to a cumulative case of ontologically focused moral arguments. | ||
| 601 | |a Williams, A. N. | ||
| 601 | |a Craig, William Lane | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Craig | |
| 650 | 4 | |a abductive | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Apologetics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a deductive | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral Argument | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Irish theological quarterly |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1951 |g 85(2020), 4, Seite 405-420 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376275782 |w (DE-600)2130458-0 |w (DE-576)265831903 |x 1752-4989 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:85 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g pages:405-420 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0021140020948379 |x Resolving-System |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3780522128 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1735720097 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201016095743 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201016||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||