The Yogi and the Scholar: Rhetorical Polemics as Literary Frames and Conceptual Framework in Tibetan Buddhist Discourse
Tibetan polemical literature is especially known and enjoyed for its harsh language and offensive comparisons, which stand in marked contrast to the philosophical and doctrinal matters that works of the genre commonly discuss. Drawing from a detailed literary analysis of a particular polemical excha...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
[2020]
|
| In: |
Entangled Religions
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 4 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Rnam-rgyal-rgya-mtsho 1846-1912
/ Blo-bzang-rab-gsal 1840-1912
/ Lamaism
/ Theory
/ Practical orientation
/ Rhetoric
/ Polemics
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy BL Buddhism KBM Asia |
| Further subjects: | B
Discourse Analysis
B Historiography B Buddhism B Rhetoric B Polemics B Tibet B Stereotypes |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1735685062 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210119112855.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201015s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.46586/er.11.2020.8694 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1735685062 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1735685062 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1036272192 |0 (DE-627)749819006 |0 (DE-576)383780314 |4 aut |a Viehbeck, Markus | |
| 109 | |a Viehbeck, Markus | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Yogi and the Scholar |b Rhetorical Polemics as Literary Frames and Conceptual Framework in Tibetan Buddhist Discourse |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Tibetan polemical literature is especially known and enjoyed for its harsh language and offensive comparisons, which stand in marked contrast to the philosophical and doctrinal matters that works of the genre commonly discuss. Drawing from a detailed literary analysis of a particular polemical exchange between Ju Mipam (1846-1912) and Pari Rapsel (1840-1912), this article calls for a distinction between what might be called “rhetorical polemics” and “formal argumentation,” and argues that the former is used to exercise framing functions towards the latter, in both structural and conceptual terms. With regard to conceptual considerations, polemical comparisons play an important role. Through frequent allusions to a stereotypical divide of Buddhist experts in practice-oriented yogis and logic-oriented scholars, these discourses connect to a larger narrative framework about the correct or incorrect transmission of Buddhism on the Tibetan plateau, which individual agents use to characterize their opponents. In so doing, they contribute to the further solidification and promotion of the master narrative that this framework entails. | ||
| 601 | |a Buddhist | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Buddhism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Polemics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tibet | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Discourse Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Historiography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rhetoric | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stereotypes | |
| 652 | |a AD:BL:KBM | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)103161562 |0 (DE-627)076877477 |0 (DE-576)165720883 |2 gnd |a Rnam-rgyal-rgya-mtsho |d 1846-1912 |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d p |0 (DE-588)103501371 |0 (DE-627)076879224 |0 (DE-576)288881710 |2 gnd |a Blo-bzang-rab-gsal |d 1840-1912 |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4034157-4 |0 (DE-627)104826347 |0 (DE-576)209005300 |2 gnd |a Tibetischer Buddhismus |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059787-8 |0 (DE-627)106142275 |0 (DE-576)209132256 |2 gnd |a Theorie |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4115613-4 |0 (DE-627)10581296X |0 (DE-576)209494719 |2 gnd |a Praxisbezug |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |0 (DE-627)104598395 |0 (DE-576)20920267X |2 gnd |a Rhetorik |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4174997-2 |0 (DE-627)105367788 |0 (DE-576)209960655 |2 gnd |a Polemik |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Entangled Religions |d Bochum : Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 2014 |g 11(2020,4) Absatz 1-64 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)802539181 |w (DE-600)2798882-X |w (DE-576)416961657 |x 2363-6696 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |
| 856 | |u https://er.ceres.rub.de/index.php/ER/article/download/8694/8304 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://er.ceres.rub.de/index.php/ER/article/view/8694 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.46586/er.11.2020.8694 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2020 |e 4 |y 11(2020,4) Absatz 1-64 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3780310899 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1735685062 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201104120304 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201015||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144204893X |a KBM | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043644 |a BL | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Lamaism,Buddhism,Tibetan Buddhism,Polemics,Practical orientation,Rhetoric,Theory |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Bouddhisme tibétain,Orientation pratique,Souci de la pratique,Souci de la pratique,Polémique,Rhétorique,Théorie |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Budismo tibetano,Orientación para la práctica,Polémica,Retórica,Teoría |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Buddhismo tibetano,Buddismo tibetano,Buddismo tibetano,Orientamento alla prassi,Polemica,Retorica,Teoria |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 修辞学,修辞法,理论,联系实践,以实践为参考,藏传佛教,藏语系佛教,论战,反调 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 修辭學,修辭法,理論,聯繫實踐,以實踐為參考,藏傳佛教,藏語系佛教,論戰,反調 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Budismo tibetano,Orientação para a prática,Polêmica,Retórica,Teoria |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Полемика,Риторика,Связь с практикой,Теория,Тибетский буддизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεωρία,Θιβετιανός Βουδισμός,Πολεμική,Πρακτικός προσανατολισμός,Ρητορική |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Xizang Zizhiqu,Bod rang skyong ljongs,Xizang zizhiqu,Xizang,Autonomes Gebiet Tibet,Tibet Autonomous Region,Tibetan Autonomous Region,Bod , Gascart, Gilbert,Tibet |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho, 'Jam-mgon 'Ju,1846-1912,Vjam-dbyangs rnam-rgyal,1846-1912,Vju-mi-pham,1846-1912,Mipham Namgyal,1846-1912,Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho,'Jam-mgon 'Ju,1846-1912,Mi-pham-'jam-dbyaṅs-rnam-rgyal-rgya-mtsho,'Ju,1846-1912,Mi-pham-phyogs-las-rnam-rgyal,'Jam-mgon,1846-1912,Mi-pham-rnam-rgyal,1846-1912,Mi-pham,Lama,1846-1912,'Jam-mgon 'Ju Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho,1846-1912,'Ju Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho,1846-1912,'Jam-dbyaṅs-rnam-rgyal, Mi-pham,1846-1912,'Jam-dpal-dgyes-pa'i-rdo-rje,1846-1912,Mi-pham-'jam-dbyaṅs-rnam-rgyal-rgya-mtsho,1846-1912,Mi-pham-rnam-par-rgyal-ba,1846-1912,Mi-pham-phyogs-las-rnam-par-rgyal-ba,1846-1912,Mi-pham-'jam-dpal-dgyes-pa,1846-1912,Mi-pham,Rin-po-che,1846-1912,'Jam-mgon Bla-ma Mi-pham,1846-1912,Mi-pham,Bla-ma,1846-1912,Mipham,Bla-ma,1846-1912,Mi-pham-'jam-dbyaṅs-phyogs-las-rnam-rgyal-dpal-bzaṅ-po,1846-1912,'Jam-mgon Mi-pham-rnam-rgyal-rgya-mtsho,1846-1912,Mi-pham-rnam-rgyal-rgya-mtsho,'Jam-mgon,1846-1912,Mipham Jamyang Gyatso,1846-1912,Mipham Jamyang Namgyal Gyatso,1846-1912,Gyatso, Mipham Jamyang Namgyal,1846-1912,Ju Mipham,1846-1912,Ju Mipham Namgyal,1846-1912,Mipham, Ju,1846-1912,Mipham,Ju,1846-1912,Mi-pham-'jam-dbyangs-rgya-mtsho,1846-1912,Mipham,1846-1912,Mipham, Jamgon,1846-1912,Jamgon Mipham,1846-1912,Mipham, Jamgön,1846-1912,Jamgön Mipham,1846-1912,Mi-pham,1846-1912,Mi-pha-rgya-mtsho, Jam-mgon Ju,1846-1912,Rinpoche, Jamgon Mipham,1846-1912,Jamgon Mipham Rinpoche,1846-1912,Jamgon Mipham,Rinpoche,1846-1912,Rinpoche, Jamgön Mipham,1846-1912,Jamgön Mipham Rinpoche,1846-1912,Jamgön Mipham,Rinpoche,1846-1912,Jamgön Mipam,1846-1912,Mipam, Jamgön,1846-1912,Blo-gros-rab-gsal-padma-bźad-pa,1846-1912,Ajitaguru,1846-1912,Gyatso, Mipham Jamyang Namgyal,Buddhistischer Gelehrter,1846-1912,Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho,ʼJam-mgon ʼJu,1846-1912,Mipham,Lama,1846-1912,A-dzi-ta,1846-1912,Mi-pham,Lama, Buddhistischer Gelehrter,1846-1912,Bla-ma Mi-pham,ʼJam-mgon ʼJu,1846-1912,Jamgön Ju Mipham Gyatsho,1846-1912,Jamgön Ju Mipham Gyatso,1846-1912,Mipham Jamyang Namgyal Gyamtso,1846-1912,Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho,ʾJam-mgon ʾJu, Buddhistischer Gelehrter,1846-1912,Mipham the Great,1846-1912,Mipham Gyatso,1846-1912,Gyur Mipham Gyatso,1846-1912,Big Mipham,1846-1912 , Dpav-ris-rab-gsal,1840-1912,Blo-bzaṅ-rab-gsal,dPa'-ris,1840-1912,dPa'-ris Blo-bzaṅ-rab-gsal,1840-1912,dpa'-ris rab-gsal,1840-1912,Hua-jui Jao-pu-se,1840-1912,Huarui Raobuse,1840-1912,Jao-pu-se Hua-jui,1840-1912,Mtsho-byuṅ-rol-baʼi-blo-gros,Dpaʼ-ris,1840-1912,Pra-śa-ka,1840-1912,Su-dhi-pra-śa-ka,1840-1912,Su-dhi-sa-ra,1840-1912,Dpa' ris Rab gsal,1840-1912,Pari Rapsel,1840-1912,Rapsel, Pari,1840-1912 , Lamaismus , Theorien,Theorien , Praxisorientierung,Praxisnähe , Beredsamkeit,Redekunst,Redetechnik |