Why Did Jesus Surrender to the Cross?: The Historical Evidence

Evidence from secular sources shows that the Romans did not attempt to crucify all in the empire who rose against them; rather, they crucified leaders as a warning to others, but often let followers go. Jesus believed or hoped that if he surrendered to the cross, though the Romans would crucify him...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mowbray, John (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Brill [2020]
Em: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Ano: 2020, Volume: 18, Número: 3, Páginas: 244-266
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Jesus Christus / Historicidade / Crucificação / Kreuzigung Jesu / Direito romano
Classificações IxTheo:HC Novo Testamento
Outras palavras-chave:B Roman criminal practice
B surrender to the cross
B Mark 1.14–15
B Historical Jesus
B forgiveness of sins
Acesso em linha: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Descrição
Resumo:Evidence from secular sources shows that the Romans did not attempt to crucify all in the empire who rose against them; rather, they crucified leaders as a warning to others, but often let followers go. Jesus believed or hoped that if he surrendered to the cross, though the Romans would crucify him as leader, they would let his followers go. He surrendered himself accordingly, to save his followers from suffering a similar fate. As a historical fact, this was successful, and his followers were preserved to become the beginnings of the church.
ISSN:1745-5197
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/17455197-01803003