A Marginal Case of Secondary Opening In GƏˁƏZ
In this article, I discuss a feature in the development of Gǝˁǝz that I term ‘secondary opening’ following the grammatical tradition of Masoretic Hebrew. By secondary opening, I refer to the development that produced a form such as bäḥär ‘sea’, which is prominent in EMML 6907 (twelfth cent.?), from...
| Published in: | Journal of Semitic studies |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
Journal of Semitic studies
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In this article, I discuss a feature in the development of Gǝˁǝz that I term ‘secondary opening’ following the grammatical tradition of Masoretic Hebrew. By secondary opening, I refer to the development that produced a form such as bäḥär ‘sea’, which is prominent in EMML 6907 (twelfth cent.?), from *baḥr-, the typical realization of which is baḥr in Standard Gǝˁǝz. While admittedly marginal, forms with secondary opening are, I argue, nonetheless important since they provide a rare glimpse at a variety of Gǝˁǝz that was not the direct ancestor of what would eventually become Standard Gǝˁǝz. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-8556 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of Semitic studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jss/fgaa007 |