Presence and absence of προαίρεσις in Christ and saints according to Maximus the Confessor and parallels in Neoplatonism
The article shows that prior to the debate with the Monothelites, Maximus the Confessor followed the Christian tradition going back to Gregory of Nyssa in recognizing the presence of προαίρεσις in Christ and the saints. Later during the debate, Maximus declined to apply προαίρεσις to Christ and star...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
[2018]
|
| In: |
Byzantinische Zeitschrift
Year: 2018, Volume: 111, Issue: 1, Pages: 39-54 |
| Further subjects: | B
Byzantine studies
B Patristics B Theologie und Religion B Altertumswissenschaften B History B Diverses B Historische Epochen |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1728847370 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220706134348.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200903s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/bz-2018-0002 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1728847370 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1728847370 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1037766512 |0 (DE-627)756018919 |0 (DE-576)391801740 |4 aut |a Benevič, Grigorij Isaakovič | |
| 109 | |a Benevič, Grigorij Isaakovič |a Benevich, Grigory I. |a Benevič, G. I. |a Benevich, Grigory |a Benevič, Grigorij I. |a Benevič, Grigorij |a Benevitch, Gregory | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Presence and absence of προαίρεσις in Christ and saints according to Maximus the Confessor and parallels in Neoplatonism |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article shows that prior to the debate with the Monothelites, Maximus the Confessor followed the Christian tradition going back to Gregory of Nyssa in recognizing the presence of προαίρεσις in Christ and the saints. Later during the debate, Maximus declined to apply προαίρεσις to Christ and started to speak about the deactivation of προαίρεσις in the saints in the state of deification. Maximus was the first Orthodox author who distinguished deliberate choice (προαίρεσις) and natural will (θέλημα), and defended the presence of natural will in Christ according to His humanity. At the same time, the opposition of desire (βούλησις) and deliberate choice (προαίρεσις) can be found in some Neoplatonists, such as Iamblichus, Proclus, and Philoponus. Iamblichus and Proclus rejected the presence of προαίρεσις in the gods and god-like humans, admitting only the presence of βούλησις - the desire for the Good. Thus, the evolution of the doctrine of Maximus the Confessor, regarding the application of προαίρε- σις to Christ and the saints, finds a parallel doctrine (and even possibly a source) in Neoplatonism.null | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Altertumswissenschaften | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Byzantinistik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Diverses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Historische Epochen | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patristik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theologie und Religion | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Byzantinische Zeitschrift |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1892 |g 111(2018), 1, Seite 39-54 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)568921224 |w (DE-600)2430676-9 |w (DE-576)303577770 |x 1868-9027 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:111 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:39-54 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/byzs/111/1/article-p39.xml |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/bz-2018-0002 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 111 |j 2018 |e 1 |h 39-54 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3746340497 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1728847370 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200903160301 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200903||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REF | |a Religionsgeschichte | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Byzantine studies,History,History,History in art,Patristics |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Histoire,Histoire,Histoire,Patristique,Études byzantines |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Bizantinística,Historia,Historia,Historia,Patrística |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Bizantinistica,Patristica,Storia,Storia |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 历史,史,拜占庭研究,教父学,古基督教著作研究 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 拜占庭研究,教父學,古基督教著作研究,歷史,史 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Bizantinística,História,História,Patrística |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Византинистика,История (мотив),История,Патристика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Βυζαντινολογία,Ιστορία (μοτίβο),Ιστορία,Πατρολογία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Byzantinologie , History,Geschichtliche Epoche,Historical development,Historische Entwicklung,Landesgeschichte,Regionalgeschichte,Ortsgeschichte,Zeitgeschichte , Patrologie |