Science and Other Common Nouns: Further Implications of Anti-Essentialism

The term “science” is a common noun that is used to designate a whole range of activities. If Reeves is right—and I think he is—that there is no essence to these activities that allows them to be objectively identified and demarcated from nonscience, then what qualifies as science is determined by c...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stump, J. B. 1969- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
Em: Zygon
Ano: 2020, Volume: 55, Número: 3, Páginas: 782-791
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Reeves, Josh A. 1976-, Against methodology in science and religion / Ciências naturais / Religião / Essencialismo
Classificações IxTheo:AB Filosofia da religião
CF Cristianismo ; Ciência 
Outras palavras-chave:B Essentialism
B Language
B Scientific Method
B Evolução
B History
B Pseudoscience
B Truth
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descrição
Resumo:The term “science” is a common noun that is used to designate a whole range of activities. If Reeves is right—and I think he is—that there is no essence to these activities that allows them to be objectively identified and demarcated from nonscience, then what qualifies as science is determined by communities. It becomes much more difficult on this antiessentialism position to identify and dismiss pseudo-science. I suggest we might find a way forward, though, by engaging a philosophical tradition that has largely been neglected in English-speaking science and religion studies, and by articulating a theory of consensus along the lines of Oreskes (2019).
ISSN:1467-9744
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12622