The Theological Debate Over Human Enhancement: An Empirical Case Study of a Mediating Organization

For most theologians, theology should ultimately be used by the laity and/or the public. However, the religion and science debate has not focused on the divide between theologians and the laity. In this case study I examine the debate among theologians about human enhancement. I focus on the extent...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Evans, John Hyde 1965- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- [2020]
In: Zygon
Year: 2020, Volume: 55, Issue: 3, Pages: 615-637
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Theology / Natural sciences / Enhancement (Medical ethics) / Debate / Mediation / Layman
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
FA Theology
Further subjects:B Human Enhancement
B Survey
B mediating organization
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:For most theologians, theology should ultimately be used by the laity and/or the public. However, the religion and science debate has not focused on the divide between theologians and the laity. In this case study I examine the debate among theologians about human enhancement. I focus on the extent to which the structure of the debate in a “mediating organization” between the theologians and the public coincides with the structure of the debate among the theologians. I conduct a survey of participants in the organization, and find that the basic divides among the theologians are largely replicated. These results, when combined with studies of the theologians themselves and the laity, provide a more holistic understanding of the future debate about human enhancement.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contains:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12619