A Case of Sustained Internal Contradiction: Unresolved Ambivalence between Evolution and Creationism
Many people feel the pull of both creationism and evolution as explanations for the origin of species, despite the direct contradiction. Some respond by endorsing theistic evolution, integrating the scientific and religious explanations by positing that God initiated or guided the process of evoluti...
Authors: | ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal of cognition and culture
Year: 2020, Volume: 20, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 338-354 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theory of evolution
/ Creationism
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy ZA Social sciences |
Further subjects: | B
Epistemology
B Opinion B Explanation B Religion B Science B Evolution |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Many people feel the pull of both creationism and evolution as explanations for the origin of species, despite the direct contradiction. Some respond by endorsing theistic evolution, integrating the scientific and religious explanations by positing that God initiated or guided the process of evolution. Others, however, simultaneously endorse both evolution and creationism despite the contradiction. Here, we illustrate this puzzling phenomenon with interviews with a diverse sample. This qualitative data reveals several approaches to coping with simultaneous inconsistent explanations. For example, some people seem to manage this contradiction by separating out ideological claims, which prioritize identity expression, from fact claims, which prioritize truth. Fitting with this interpretation, ambivalent individuals tended to call explanations “beliefs” (not knowledge), avoid mention of truth or falsity, and ground one or both beliefs in identity and personal history. We conclude with a brief discussion of the affordances of this distinction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5373 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of cognition and culture
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685373-12340088 |