Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science
Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are...
| Published in: | Theology and science |
|---|---|
| Authors: | ; ; ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2020
|
| In: |
Theology and science
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AE Psychology of religion CF Christianity and Science ZD Psychology |
| Further subjects: | B
testimonial
B ignosticism B religion–science models B hyperactive agent-detection device B igtheism B Evidence B Confirmation bias B falsification |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221 |