A Critique of Rob Lovering's Criticism of the Substance View

In his article, The Substance View: a critique, Rob Lovering argues that the substance view - according to which the human embryo is a person entitled to human rights - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. In this article I respond to his criticism by arguing th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Friberg-Fernros, Henrik (Author)
Contributors: Lovering, Rob (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Simkulet, William (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2015]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 29, Issue: 3, Pages: 211-216
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B substance view
B reductio ad absurdum
B Rob Lovering
B Abortion
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727700864
003 DE-627
005 20220104130215.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200824s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12080  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727700864 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727700864 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1139797158  |0 (DE-627)897681509  |0 (DE-576)493472320  |4 aut  |a Friberg-Fernros, Henrik 
109 |a Friberg-Fernros, Henrik  |a Fernros, Henrik Friberg- 
245 1 2 |a A Critique of Rob Lovering's Criticism of the Substance View 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In his article, The Substance View: a critique, Rob Lovering argues that the substance view - according to which the human embryo is a person entitled to human rights - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. In this article I respond to his criticism by arguing that either his arguments fail because the proponents of the substance view are not obligated to hold positions which may be considered absurd, or because the positions which they are assumed to be obligated to hold, are not absurd at all. 
650 4 |a Rob Lovering 
650 4 |a Abortion 
650 4 |a reductio ad absurdum 
650 4 |a substance view 
652 |a NBE:NCH 
700 1 |a Lovering, Rob  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |0 (DE-588)103192860X  |0 (DE-627)737566779  |0 (DE-576)37963449X  |4 ant  |a Lovering, Rob 
700 1 |a Simkulet, William  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 29(2015), 3, Seite 211-216  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:211-216 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Lovering, Rob  |t THE SUBSTANCE VIEW: A CRITIQUE  |d 2013  |w (DE-627)1781884560 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Lovering, Rob  |t The Substance View  |d 2017  |w (DE-627)172765837X 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Simkulet, William  |t A Critique of Henrik Friberg-Fernros's Defense of the Substance View  |d 2016  |w (DE-627)1727674154 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12080  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12080  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3742400215 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727700864 
LOK |0 005 20210812093211 
LOK |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw