A Critique of Rob Lovering's Criticism of the Substance View
In his article, The Substance View: a critique, Rob Lovering argues that the substance view - according to which the human embryo is a person entitled to human rights - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. In this article I respond to his criticism by arguing th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | ; |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 29, Issue: 3, Pages: 211-216 |
IxTheo Classification: | NBE Anthropology NCH Medical ethics |
Further subjects: | B
substance view
B reductio ad absurdum B Rob Lovering B Abortion |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727700864 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220104130215.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200824s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12080 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727700864 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727700864 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1139797158 |0 (DE-627)897681509 |0 (DE-576)493472320 |4 aut |a Friberg-Fernros, Henrik | |
109 | |a Friberg-Fernros, Henrik |a Fernros, Henrik Friberg- | ||
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Critique of Rob Lovering's Criticism of the Substance View |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In his article, The Substance View: a critique, Rob Lovering argues that the substance view - according to which the human embryo is a person entitled to human rights - leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. In this article I respond to his criticism by arguing that either his arguments fail because the proponents of the substance view are not obligated to hold positions which may be considered absurd, or because the positions which they are assumed to be obligated to hold, are not absurd at all. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Rob Lovering | |
650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
650 | 4 | |a reductio ad absurdum | |
650 | 4 | |a substance view | |
652 | |a NBE:NCH | ||
700 | 1 | |a Lovering, Rob |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)103192860X |0 (DE-627)737566779 |0 (DE-576)37963449X |4 ant |a Lovering, Rob | |
700 | 1 | |a Simkulet, William |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 29(2015), 3, Seite 211-216 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:211-216 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Lovering, Rob |t THE SUBSTANCE VIEW: A CRITIQUE |d 2013 |w (DE-627)1781884560 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Lovering, Rob |t The Substance View |d 2017 |w (DE-627)172765837X |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Simkulet, William |t A Critique of Henrik Friberg-Fernros's Defense of the Substance View |d 2016 |w (DE-627)1727674154 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12080 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12080 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3742400215 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727700864 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210812093211 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |