The Social Value Requirement Reconsidered
It is widely assumed that it is ethical to conduct research with human subjects only if the research has social value. There are two standard arguments for this view. The allocation argument claims that public funds should not be devoted to research that lacks social value. The exploitation avoidanc...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
Στο/Στη: |
Bioethics
Έτος: 2015, Τόμος: 29, Τεύχος: 5, Σελίδες: 301-308 |
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | NCB Ατομική Ηθική NCC Κοινωνική Ηθική NCH Ιατρική Ηθική |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
social value
B research ethics B Exploitation |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Σύνοψη: | It is widely assumed that it is ethical to conduct research with human subjects only if the research has social value. There are two standard arguments for this view. The allocation argument claims that public funds should not be devoted to research that lacks social value. The exploitation avoidance argument claims that subjects are exploited if research has no social value. The primary purpose of this article is to argue that these arguments do not succeed. The allocation argument has little relevance to commercial research. Social value is not necessary to avoid exploitation if subjects benefit from participation. Although the standard arguments for a social value requirement do not succeed, that view might be justified in a different way. It might be justified by appeal to the importance of social trust or the integrity of physician investigators. It is possible but doubtful that these arguments succeed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-8519 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Bioethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12128 |