Counterfactual Consent and the Use of Deception in Research
The use of deception for the purposes of research is a widespread practice within many areas of study. If we want to avoid either absolute acceptance or absolute rejection of this practice then we require some method of distinguishing between those uses of deception which are morally acceptable and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 29, Issue: 7, Pages: 470-477 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCJ Ethics of science |
| Further subjects: | B
Consent
B Deception B research ethics |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727698231 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210813122532.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200824s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12142 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727698231 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727698231 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wilson, Alan T. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Counterfactual Consent and the Use of Deception in Research |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The use of deception for the purposes of research is a widespread practice within many areas of study. If we want to avoid either absolute acceptance or absolute rejection of this practice then we require some method of distinguishing between those uses of deception which are morally acceptable and those which are not. In this article I discuss the concept of counterfactual consent, and propose a related distinction between counterfactual-defeating deception and counterfactual-compatible deception. The aim is to show that this proposed distinction will be useful in furthering the debate regarding the use of deception for the purposes of research. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Consent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deception | |
| 650 | 4 | |a research ethics | |
| 652 | |a NCJ | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 29(2015), 7, Seite 470-477 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2015 |g number:7 |g pages:470-477 |
| 856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12142 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12142 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12142 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3742394002 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727698231 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210813122532 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736582 |a NCJ | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||