In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions
End-of-life decision-making is controversial. There are different views about when it is appropriate to limit life-sustaining treatment, and about what palliative options are permissible. One approach to decisions of this nature sees consensus as crucial. Decisions to limit treatment are made only i...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 109-118 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCH Medical ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
intensive care
B Medical Ethics B withdrawing treatment B Consensus B Neuroethics |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727690826 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210824125620.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200824s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12162 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727690826 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727690826 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1035485133 |0 (DE-627)747586047 |0 (DE-576)383073898 |4 aut |a Wilkinson, Dominic | |
| 109 | |a Wilkinson, Dominic | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In Favour of Medical Dissensus |b Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a End-of-life decision-making is controversial. There are different views about when it is appropriate to limit life-sustaining treatment, and about what palliative options are permissible. One approach to decisions of this nature sees consensus as crucial. Decisions to limit treatment are made only if all or a majority of caregivers agree. We argue, however, that it is a mistake to require professional consensus in end-of-life decisions. In the first part of the article we explore practical, ethical, and legal factors that support agreement. We analyse subjective and objective accounts of moral reasoning: accord is neither necessary nor sufficient for decisions. We propose an alternative norm for decisions - that of ‘professional dissensus’. In the final part of the article we address the role of agreement in end-of-life policy. Such guidelines can ethically be based on dissensus rather than consensus. Disagreement is not always a bad thing. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Consensus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a intensive care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neuroethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a withdrawing treatment | |
| 652 | |a NCH | ||
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1163621471 |0 (DE-627)102793496X |0 (DE-576)508091942 |4 aut |a Savulescu, Julian |d 1963- | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Truog, Robert |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 30(2016), 2, Seite 109-118 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:109-118 |
| 856 | |u https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4864446?pdf=render |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12162 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12162 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3742372599 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727690826 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210824125620 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||