Should We Reject Donated Organs on Moral Grounds or Permit Allocation Using Non-Medical Criteria?: A Qualitative Study
Conditional and directed deceased organ donations occur when donors (or often their next of kin) attempt to influence the allocation of their donated organs. This can include asking that the organs are given to or withheld from certain types of people, or that they are given to specified individuals...
Authors: | ; ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 30, Issue: 4, Pages: 282-292 |
IxTheo Classification: | KBF British Isles NCH Medical ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Allocation
B conditional donation B Organ Donation B transplants |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727687205 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210824133658.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200824s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12169 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727687205 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727687205 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Moorlock, Greg |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Should We Reject Donated Organs on Moral Grounds or Permit Allocation Using Non-Medical Criteria? |b A Qualitative Study |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Conditional and directed deceased organ donations occur when donors (or often their next of kin) attempt to influence the allocation of their donated organs. This can include asking that the organs are given to or withheld from certain types of people, or that they are given to specified individuals. Donations of these types have raised ethical concerns, and have been prohibited in many countries, including the UK. In this article we report the findings from a qualitative study involving interviews with potential donors (n = 20), potential recipients (n = 9) and transplant staff (n = 11), and use these results as a springboard for further ethical commentary. We argue that although participants favoured unconditional donation, this preference was grounded in a false distinction between ‘medical’ and ‘non-medical’ allocation criteria. Although there are good reasons to maintain organ allocation based primarily upon the existing ‘medical’ criteria, it may be premature to reject all other potential criteria as being unacceptable. Part of participants' justification for allocating organs using ‘medical’ criteria was to make the best use of available organs and avoid wasting their potential benefit, but this can also justify accepting conditional donations in some circumstances. We draw a distinction between two types of waste - absolute and relative - and argue that accepting conditional donations may offer a balance between these forms of waste. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Allocation | |
650 | 4 | |a conditional donation | |
650 | 4 | |a Organ Donation | |
650 | 4 | |a transplants | |
652 | |a KBF:NCH | ||
700 | 1 | |a Bramhall, Simon |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Draper, Heather |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1122864353 |0 (DE-627)876216084 |0 (DE-576)481522395 |4 aut |a Ives, Jonathan |d 1980- | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 30(2016), 4, Seite 282-292 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:282-292 |
856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12169 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12169 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12169 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 30 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 282-292 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3742364936 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727687205 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210824133658 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044888 |a KBF | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |