Should we use Commitment Contracts to Regulate Student use of Cognitive Enhancing Drugs?
Are universities justified in trying to regulate student use of cognitive enhancing drugs? In this article I argue that they can be, but that the most appropriate kind of regulatory intervention is likely to be voluntary in nature. To be precise, I argue that universities could justifiably adopt a c...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 30, Issue: 8, Pages: 568-578 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCH Medical ethics NCJ Ethics of science |
| Further subjects: | B
cognitive enhancement
B Enhancement B philosophy of education |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727675495 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230426130613.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200824s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12273 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727675495 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727675495 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1031899413 |0 (DE-627)737511834 |0 (DE-576)37959949X |4 aut |a Danaher, John |d 1967- | |
| 109 | |a Danaher, John 1967- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Should we use Commitment Contracts to Regulate Student use of Cognitive Enhancing Drugs? |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Are universities justified in trying to regulate student use of cognitive enhancing drugs? In this article I argue that they can be, but that the most appropriate kind of regulatory intervention is likely to be voluntary in nature. To be precise, I argue that universities could justifiably adopt a commitment contract system of regulation wherein students are encouraged to voluntarily commit to not using cognitive enhancing drugs (or to using them in a specific way). If they are found to breach that commitment, they should be penalized by, for example, forfeiting a number of marks on their assessments. To defend this model of regulation, I adopt a recently-proposed evaluative framework for determining the appropriateness of enhancement in specific domains of activity, and I focus on particular existing types of cognitive enhancement drugs, not hypothetical or potential forms. In this way, my argument is tailored to the specific features of university education, and common patterns of usage among students. It is not concerned with the general ethical propriety of using cognitive enhancing drugs. | ||
| 601 | |a Student | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive enhancement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Enhancement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of education | |
| 652 | |a NCH:NCJ | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 30(2016), 8, Seite 568-578 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2016 |g number:8 |g pages:568-578 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/DANSWU.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12273 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12273 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 30 |j 2016 |e 8 |h 568-578 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3742338293 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727675495 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210831160949 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736582 |a NCJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Amélioration humaine |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Mejoramiento humano |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement <etica medica>,Potenziamento (etica medica),Potenziamento |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神經增強 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Melhoramento humano |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Улучшение (медицинская этика) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενίσχυση <ιατρική ηθική>,Βελτίωση (ιατρική ηθική),Ενδυνάμωση (ιατρική ηθική) |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Human enhancement |