Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing

Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's controversial article ‘After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?’ has received a lot of criticism since its publishing. Part of the recent criticism has been made by pro-life philosopher Christopher Kaczor, who argues against infanticide in his up...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Räsänen, Joona (Author)
Contributors: Kaczor, Christopher Robert 1969- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Rodger, Daniel (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2016]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 30, Issue: 9, Pages: 656-662
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Harm
B Persons
B Infanticide
B Abortion
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727674014
003 DE-627
005 20220104124124.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200824s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12281  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727674014 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727674014 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Räsänen, Joona  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's controversial article ‘After-Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live?’ has received a lot of criticism since its publishing. Part of the recent criticism has been made by pro-life philosopher Christopher Kaczor, who argues against infanticide in his updated book ‘Ethics of Abortion’. Kaczor makes four arguments to show where Giubilini and Minerva's argument for permitting infanticide goes wrong. In this article I argue that Kaczor's arguments, and some similar arguments presented by other philosophers, are mistaken and cannot show Giubilini and Minerva's view to be flawed. I claim that if one wants to reject the permissibility of infanticide, one must find better arguments for doing so. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Abortion 
650 4 |a Harm 
650 4 |a Infanticide 
650 4 |a Persons 
652 |a NBE:NCH 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |0 (DE-588)124351921  |0 (DE-627)085805459  |0 (DE-576)186236786  |4 ant  |a Kaczor, Christopher Robert  |d 1969- 
700 1 |a Rodger, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 30(2016), 9, Seite 656-662  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2016  |g number:9  |g pages:656-662 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Kaczor, Christopher Robert, 1969 -   |t A dubious defense of ‘after-birth abortion’  |d 2018  |w (DE-627)1727584562 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Rodger, Daniel  |t Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing  |d 2018  |w (DE-627)1727582713 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/RSNPAA.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12281  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12281  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 30  |j 2016  |e 9  |h 656-662 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3742335200 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727674014 
LOK |0 005 20210831163453 
LOK |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw