The Edge of Human? The Problem with the Posthuman as the ‘Beyond’
This article asks whether enhancement can truly lead to something beyond humanity, or whether it is, itself, an inherently human act. The ‘posthuman’ is an uncertain proposition. What, exactly, would one be? Many commentators suggest it to be an endpoint for the use of enhancement technologies, yet...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 171-179 |
IxTheo Classification: | NBE Anthropology NCH Medical ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Human
B Humanity B Moral value B Posthuman B Embodiment B Enhancement |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727659724 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210902095537.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200824s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12318 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727659724 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727659724 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lawrence, David R. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Edge of Human? The Problem with the Posthuman as the ‘Beyond’ |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article asks whether enhancement can truly lead to something beyond humanity, or whether it is, itself, an inherently human act. The ‘posthuman’ is an uncertain proposition. What, exactly, would one be? Many commentators suggest it to be an endpoint for the use of enhancement technologies, yet few choose to codify the term outright; which frequently leads to unnecessary confusion. Characterizing and contextualizing the term, particularly its more novel uses, is therefore a valuable enterprise. The abuse of the term ‘Human’, especially in the context of the enhancement debate and the myriad meanings ascribed to it, could give ‘posthuman’ very different slants depending on one's assumptions. There are perhaps three main senses in which the term ‘human’ is employed: the biological, the moral, and the self-idealizing. In the first of these, ‘human’ is often conflated with Homo sapiens, and used interchangeably to denote species; in the second, ‘human’ (or ‘humanity’) generally refers to a community of beings which qualify as having a certain moral value; and the third, the self-idealizing sense, is more descriptive; a label denoting the qualities that make us who we are as beings, or ‘what matters about those who matter’. So, what might enhancement make us? A novel species or genus of hominid? Or, perhaps, a morally more valuable being than a regular human? Of course, there's a third option: that a posthuman is a being which embodies our self-ideal more successfully than we do ourselves - one ‘more human than human’. Which to choose? | ||
601 | |a Problem | ||
650 | 4 | |a Embodiment | |
650 | 4 | |a Enhancement | |
650 | 4 | |a Human | |
650 | 4 | |a Humanity | |
650 | 4 | |a Moral value | |
650 | 4 | |a Posthuman | |
652 | |a NBE:NCH | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 31(2017), 3, Seite 171-179 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:171-179 |
856 | |u https://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/fulltext.aspx?url=230848/0108D5CF-AA93-482A-A8EA-23A9853AE40E.pdf&pub_id=230848 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12318 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12318 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3742302582 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727659724 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210902095537 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Embodiment,Enhancement |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Amélioration humaine,Embodiment,Cognition incarnée,Cognition incarnée |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Corporificación,Mejoramiento humano |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement <etica medica>,Potenziamento (etica medica),Potenziamento,Filosofia del corpo,Incarnazione,Incarnazione |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神經增強 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Corporificação,Melhoramento humano |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Воплощённое познание,Улучшение (медицинская этика) |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενίσχυση <ιατρική ηθική>,Βελτίωση (ιατρική ηθική),Ενδυνάμωση (ιατρική ηθική),Ενσάρκωση |
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Verkörperung , Human enhancement |