What Outcomes do Dutch Healthcare Professionals Perceive as Important Before Participation in Moral Case Deliberation?

Background There has been little attention paid to research on the outcomes of clinical ethics support (CES) or critical reflection on what constitutes a good CES outcome. Understanding how CES users perceive the importance of CES outcomes can contribute to a better understanding, use of and normati...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Snoo‐Trimp, Janine de (Author) ; Molewijk, Bert 1966- (Author) ; Svantesson, Mia (Author) ; Vet, Riekie de (Author) ; Widdershoven, Guy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2017]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 31, Issue: 4, Pages: 246-257
IxTheo Classification:KBD Benelux countries
NCH Medical ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
Further subjects:B clinical ethics support
B Moral Case Deliberation
B Outcomes
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727658302
003 DE-627
005 20210902103006.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200824s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12354  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727658302 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727658302 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Snoo‐Trimp, Janine de  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a What Outcomes do Dutch Healthcare Professionals Perceive as Important Before Participation in Moral Case Deliberation? 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Background There has been little attention paid to research on the outcomes of clinical ethics support (CES) or critical reflection on what constitutes a good CES outcome. Understanding how CES users perceive the importance of CES outcomes can contribute to a better understanding, use of and normative reflection on CES outcomes. Objective To describe the perceptions of Dutch healthcare professionals on important outcomes of moral case deliberation (MCD), prior to MCD participation, and to compare results between respondents. Methods This mixed-methods study used both the Euro-MCD instrument and semi-structured interviews. Healthcare professionals who were about to implement MCD were recruited from nursing homes, hospitals, psychiatry and mentally disabled care institutions. Results 331 healthcare professionals completed the Euro-MCD instrument, 13 healthcare professionals were interviewed. The outcomes perceived as most important were ‘more open communication’, ‘better mutual understanding’, ‘concrete actions’, ‘see the situation from different perspectives’, ‘consensus on how to manage the situation’ and ‘find more courses of action’. Interviewees also perceived improving quality of care, professionalism and the organization as important. Women, nurses, managers and professionals in mentally disabled care rated outcomes more highly than other respondents. Conclusions Dutch healthcare professionals perceived the MCD outcomes related to collaboration as most important. The empirical findings can contribute to shared ownership of MCD and a more specific use of MCD in different contexts. They can inform international comparative research on different CES types and contribute to normative discussions concerning CES outcomes. Future studies should reflect upon important MCD outcomes after having experienced MCD. 
650 4 |a clinical ethics support 
650 4 |a Moral Case Deliberation 
650 4 |a Outcomes 
652 |a KBD:NCH:NCJ 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1177284790  |0 (DE-627)1048654893  |0 (DE-576)517360489  |4 aut  |a Molewijk, Bert  |d 1966- 
700 1 |a Svantesson, Mia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vet, Riekie de  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Widdershoven, Guy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 31(2017), 4, Seite 246-257  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g pages:246-257 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12354  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12354  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 31  |j 2017  |e 4  |h 246-257 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3742297546 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727658302 
LOK |0 005 20210902103006 
LOK |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044764  |a KBD 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw