Assisted Dying & Disability
This article explores at least two dominant critiques of assisted dying from a disability rights perspective. In spite of these critiques, I conclude that assisted dying ought to be permissible. I arrive at the conclusion that if we respect and value people with disabilities, we ought to permit assi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 31, Issue: 6, Pages: 484-489 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KBQ North America NCH Medical ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Disability
B Autonomy B assisted dying B Euthanasia |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727652975 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210902112605.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200824s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12353 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727652975 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727652975 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1053639929 |0 (DE-627)790401991 |0 (DE-576)409582948 |4 aut |a Riddle, Christopher A. | |
| 109 | |a Riddle, Christopher A. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assisted Dying & Disability |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article explores at least two dominant critiques of assisted dying from a disability rights perspective. In spite of these critiques, I conclude that assisted dying ought to be permissible. I arrive at the conclusion that if we respect and value people with disabilities, we ought to permit assisted dying. I do so in the following manner. First, I examine recent changes in legislation that have occurred since the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End-of-Life Decision-Making report, published in this journal. I suggest that these changes are likely to only strengthen opposition to assisted dying from disability rights activists and people with disabilities. Second, I focus on respect for people with disabilities and in particular, respect for their autonomy and decision-making abilities. Third, I explore the opposition to assisted dying that focuses on risk and the vulnerability of people with disabilities. Here I suggest that this risk ought not to be of special concern. Ultimately, I conclude that upholding respect for the disabled requires the legalization of assisted dying, rather than the denial of access in a misguided effort to protect people with disabilities. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a assisted dying | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Euthanasia | |
| 652 | |a KBQ:NCH | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 31(2017), 6, Seite 484-489 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2017 |g number:6 |g pages:484-489 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12353 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12353 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3742286390 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727652975 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210902112605 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049227 |a KBQ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||