The parenthood argument
Don Marquis is well known for his future like ours theory (FLO), according to which the killing beings like us is seriously morally wrong because it deprives us of a future we can value. According to Marquis, human fetuses possess a future they can come to value, and thus according to FLO have a rig...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Bioethics
Année: 2018, Volume: 32, Numéro: 1, Pages: 10-15 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | NCB Éthique individuelle NCH Éthique médicale |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
future like ours view
B parenthood argument B Judith Jarvis Thomson B deprivation view B Don Marquis B parental obligations B Abortion |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Maison d'édition) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727586344 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210906141907.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200821s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12409 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727586344 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727586344 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Simkulet, William |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The parenthood argument |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Don Marquis is well known for his future like ours theory (FLO), according to which the killing beings like us is seriously morally wrong because it deprives us of a future we can value. According to Marquis, human fetuses possess a future they can come to value, and thus according to FLO have a right to life. Recently Mark Brown has argued that even if FLO shows fetuses have a right to life, it fails to show that fetuses have a right to use their mother's body, evoking Judith Jarvis Thomson's famous violinist case. In the wake of Brown's conclusion, Marquis presents a new argument—the parenthood argument (PA)—which he believes shows that abortion is seriously morally wrong. Here I argue that the PA fails to show abortion is seriously morally wrong for the same reasons FLO fails to show abortion is seriously morally wrong. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Don Marquis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judith Jarvis Thomson | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a deprivation view | |
| 650 | 4 | |a future like ours view | |
| 650 | 4 | |a parental obligations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a parenthood argument | |
| 652 | |a NCB:NCH | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 32(2018), 1, Seite 10-15 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:10-15 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12409 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12409 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3741589950 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727586344 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210906141907 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200821||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||