Why pro-life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics
I argued in ‘Pro-life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing’ that arguments presented by pro-life philosophers are mistaken and cannot show infanticide to be immoral. Several scholars have offered responses to my arguments. In this paper, I reply to my critics: Daniel Rodger,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2018]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 32, Issue: 9, Pages: 628-633 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NBE Anthropology NCH Medical ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Killing
B substance view B Harm B Persons B Infanticide B Abortion |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727534549 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220124113229.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12502 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727534549 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727534549 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Räsänen, Joona |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why pro-life arguments still are not convincing |b A reply to my critics |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a I argued in ‘Pro-life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing’ that arguments presented by pro-life philosophers are mistaken and cannot show infanticide to be immoral. Several scholars have offered responses to my arguments. In this paper, I reply to my critics: Daniel Rodger, Bruce P. Blackshaw and Clinton Wilcox. I also reply to Christopher Kaczor. I argue that pro-life arguments still are not convincing. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Harm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infanticide | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Killing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Persons | |
| 650 | 4 | |a substance view | |
| 652 | |a NBE:NCH | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Rodger, Daniel |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)124351921 |0 (DE-627)085805459 |0 (DE-576)186236786 |4 ant |a Kaczor, Christopher Robert |d 1969- | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Blackshaw, Bruce P. |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 32(2018), 9, Seite 628-633 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2018 |g number:9 |g pages:628-633 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Rodger, Daniel |t Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing |d 2018 |w (DE-627)1727582713 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Kaczor, Christopher Robert, 1969 - |t A dubious defense of ‘after-birth abortion’ |d 2018 |w (DE-627)1727584562 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Blackshaw, Bruce P. |t Why a right to life rules out infanticide |d 2019 |w (DE-627)1727502671 |
| 856 | |u https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/10852/73020/1/WHY%2bPRO-LIFE%2bARGUMENTS%2bSTILL%2bARE%2bNOT%2bCONVINCING.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12502 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12502 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3741351288 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727534549 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210908155423 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||