Can conscientious objection lead to eugenic practices against LGBT individuals?

In a recent article in this journal, Abram Brummett argues that new and future assisted reproductive technologies will provide challenging ethical questions relating to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. Brummett notes that it is likely that some clinicians may wish to conscienti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Saad, Toni C. (Author) ; Rodger, Daniel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 4, Pages: 524-528
IxTheo Classification:NCF Sexual ethics
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B Conscientious Objection
B Values
B Metaphysics
B Naturalism
B eugenic
B LGBT
B assisted reproductive technologies
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727507932
003 DE-627
005 20210927093238.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12557  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727507932 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727507932 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Saad, Toni C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Can conscientious objection lead to eugenic practices against LGBT individuals? 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In a recent article in this journal, Abram Brummett argues that new and future assisted reproductive technologies will provide challenging ethical questions relating to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. Brummett notes that it is likely that some clinicians may wish to conscientiously object to offering assisted reproductive technologies to LGBT couples on moral or religious grounds, and argues that such appeals to conscience should be constrained. We argue that Brummett's case is unsuccessful because he: does not adequately interact with his opponents’ views; equivocates on the meaning of ‘natural’; fails to show that the practice he opposes is eugenic in any non-trivial sense; and fails to justify and explicate the relevance of the naturalism he proposes. We do not argue that conscience protections should exist for those objecting to providing LGBT people with artificial reproductive technologies, but only show that Brummett's arguments are insufficient to prove that they should not. 
601 |a Individuation 
650 4 |a LGBT 
650 4 |a assisted reproductive technologies 
650 4 |a Conscientious Objection 
650 4 |a eugenic 
650 4 |a Metaphysics 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a Values 
652 |a NCF:NCH 
700 1 |a Rodger, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 33(2019), 4, Seite 524-528  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:524-528 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/SAACCO-2.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12557  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12557  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 33  |j 2019  |e 4  |h 524-528 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741287008 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727507932 
LOK |0 005 20220121160623 
LOK |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052961  |a NCF 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a LGBT 
STB 0 0 |a LGBT 
STC 0 0 |a LGBT 
STD 0 0 |a LGBT,GLBT,GLBT 
STF 0 0 |a LGBT 
STG 0 0 |a LGBT 
STH 0 0 |a LGBT 
STI 0 0 |a ΛΟΑΤ,LGBT 
SYE 0 0 |a LGBTQ,LGBTQI,GLBT,LGT,LSBT,LGBTQ,LGBTQI,LGBTQIA,LGBTQIA*,LGBTIQ,LGBTIQ+,LSBTIQ*,LGBTI,LSBTI,LSBTTIQ,LSBTTIQ*,LGTB,Queer