How to reject Benatar's asymmetry argument
In this article I reconsider David Benatar's primary argument for anti-natalism—the asymmetry argument—and outline a three-step process for rejecting it. I begin in Part 2 by reconstructing the asymmetry argument into three main premises. I then turn in Parts 3-5 to explain how each of these pr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 6, Pages: 674-683 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NBE Anthropology NCA Ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
procreative ethics
B quality of life argument B Anti-natalism B David Benatar B asymmetry argument |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727506057 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210928164027.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12582 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727506057 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727506057 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Magnusson, Erik |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How to reject Benatar's asymmetry argument |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article I reconsider David Benatar's primary argument for anti-natalism—the asymmetry argument—and outline a three-step process for rejecting it. I begin in Part 2 by reconstructing the asymmetry argument into three main premises. I then turn in Parts 3-5 to explain how each of these premises is in fact false. Finally, I conclude in Part 6 by considering the relationship between the asymmetry argument and the quality of life argument in Benatar's overall case for anti-natalism and argue that it is the latter argument that is actually doing the work. In this sense, the asymmetry argument is not only unsuccessful in generating Benatar's anti-natalist conclusion, it is also unnecessary as well. | ||
| 601 | |a Asymmetrie | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a David Benatar | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Anti-natalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a asymmetry argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a procreative ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a quality of life argument | |
| 652 | |a NBE:NCA:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 33(2019), 6, Seite 674-683 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2019 |g number:6 |g pages:674-683 |
| 856 | |u http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/43932/1/magnusson_bioethics_howto.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12582 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12582 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 33 |j 2019 |e 6 |h 674-683 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 374128260X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727506057 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220124111930 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||