Institutional refusal to offer assisted dying: A response to Shadd and Shadd

Ever since medical assistance in dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in 2016, controversy has enveloped the refusal by many faith-based institutions to allow this service on their premises. In a recent article in this journal, Philip and Joshua Shadd have proposed ‘changing the conversation’ on this...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sumner, Leonard W. 1941- (Author)
Contributors: Shadd, Philip (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 8, Pages: 970-972
IxTheo Classification:KBQ North America
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NCH Medical ethics
RK Charity work
Further subjects:B medical assistance in dying
B institutional refusal
B Conscientious Objection
B Palliative Care
B assisted dying
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727502698
003 DE-627
005 20220124112657.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12641  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727502698 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727502698 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)140772596  |0 (DE-627)62160173X  |0 (DE-576)163245320  |4 aut  |a Sumner, Leonard W.  |d 1941- 
109 |a Sumner, Leonard W. 1941-  |a Sumner, Leonard 1941-  |a Sumner, L. W. 1941-  |a Sumner, Leonard Wayne 1941- 
245 1 0 |a Institutional refusal to offer assisted dying  |b A response to Shadd and Shadd 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Ever since medical assistance in dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in 2016, controversy has enveloped the refusal by many faith-based institutions to allow this service on their premises. In a recent article in this journal, Philip and Joshua Shadd have proposed ‘changing the conversation’ on this issue, reframing it as an exercise not of conscience but of an institutional right of self-governance. This reframing, they claim, will serve to show how health-care institutions may be justified in refusing to provide MAID on moral or religious grounds. I argue that it will not make it easier to justify institutional refusal, and is likely to make it harder. 
601 |a Institution 
650 4 |a assisted dying 
650 4 |a Conscientious Objection 
650 4 |a institutional refusal 
650 4 |a medical assistance in dying 
650 4 |a Palliative Care 
652 |a KBQ:KDB:NCH:RK 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |0 (DE-588)1062495551  |0 (DE-627)805297189  |0 (DE-576)41827942X  |4 ant  |a Shadd, Philip 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 33(2019), 8, Seite 970-972  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:8  |g pages:970-972 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Shadd, Philip  |t Institutional non-participation in assisted dying  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)1727524322 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12641  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12641  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741275948 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727502698 
LOK |0 005 20220124112657 
LOK |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049227  |a KBQ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053275  |a RK 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049839  |a KDB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw