Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?
Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that...
| Κύριοι συγγραφείς: | ; |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
[2020]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Bioethics
Έτος: 2020, Τόμος: 34, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 33-40 |
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | NBE Ανθρωπολογία NCH Ιατρική Ηθική |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Disability
B Human Dignity B Oviedo Convention B Equality B germline genome editing |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727468848 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210930153239.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200819s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12607 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727468848 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727468848 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Segers, Seppe |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity? |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Germline genome editing is often disapproved of at the international policy level because of its possible threats to human dignity. However, from a critical perspective the relationship between this emerging technology and human dignity is relatively understudied. We explore the main principles that are referred to when ‘human dignity' is invoked in this context; namely, the link with eugenics, the idea of a common genetic heritage, the principle of equal birth and broader equality and justice concerns. Yet the concept is also used in favour of germline genome editing as it might improve the overall well-being of future generations. We conclude that dignity concerns do not justify a complete ban on safe heritable genome editing but should inform the implementation of side constraints to ensure that the value judgements about human traits that are inherent in this practice do not result in a diminished basic respect for those people affected by them. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Oviedo Convention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Equality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a germline genome editing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Dignity | |
| 652 | |a NBE:NCH | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Mertes, Heidi |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 34(2020), 1, Seite 33-40 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:33-40 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12607 |x Verlag |7 1 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12607 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3741222682 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727468848 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210930153239 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 19-08-20 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
