Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion

The ‘impairment argument’ against abortion developed by Perry Hendricks aims to derive the wrongness of abortion from the wrongness of causing foetal alcohol syndrome (FAS). Hendricks endorses an ‘impairment principle’, which states that, if it is wrong to inflict an impairment of a certain degree o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crummett, Dustin (Author)
Contributors: Hendricks, Perry (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: [2020]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 214-220
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B impairment argument
B Moral Demandingness
B Judith Jarvis Thomson
B Abortion
B violinist thought experiment
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Publisher)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1727465989
003 DE-627
005 20220124120314.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200819s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12699  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727465989 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727465989 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Crummett, Dustin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Crummett, Dustin 
245 1 0 |a Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The ‘impairment argument’ against abortion developed by Perry Hendricks aims to derive the wrongness of abortion from the wrongness of causing foetal alcohol syndrome (FAS). Hendricks endorses an ‘impairment principle’, which states that, if it is wrong to inflict an impairment of a certain degree on an organism, then, ceteris paribus, it is also wrong to inflict a more severe impairment on that organism. Causing FAS is wrong in virtue of the impairment it inflicts. But abortion inflicts an even more severe impairment (death), and so, ceteris paribus, is also wrong. Notably, Hendricks thinks that this argument does not require the claim that the foetus is a person. Here, I respond to Hendricks by arguing that the ceteris paribus clause of the impairment principle is not met in ordinary cases of pregnancy. Carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term is much more burdensome than is refraining from excessive drinking for nine months. This provides a pro tanto justification for obtaining an abortion that does not apply to causing FAS. If the foetus is not a person, it seems fairly clear to me that this justification is strong enough to render abortion permissible. Hendricks is therefore incorrect in claiming that the impairment argument can go without claims concerning foetal personhood. If the foetus is a person, then whether burdensomeness justifies abortion depends on certain questions relating to Thomson’s famous violinist argument. I will not attempt to answer those. But anyone who is otherwise sympathetic to Thomson’s argument should not be moved by the impairment argument. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Judith Jarvis Thomson 
650 4 |a Abortion 
650 4 |a impairment argument 
650 4 |a Moral Demandingness 
650 4 |a violinist thought experiment 
652 |a NBE:NCH 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |0 (DE-588)117224216X  |0 (DE-627)1041052057  |0 (DE-576)514446862  |4 ant  |a Hendricks, Perry 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 34(2020), 2, Seite 214-220  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:2  |g pages:214-220 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Hendricks, Perry  |t Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)1727521862 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12699  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12699  |x Verlag  |7 1 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12699  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741216259 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727465989 
LOK |0 005 20211005021609 
LOK |0 008 200819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 939   |a 19-08-20  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw