The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited

Perry Hendricks has recently presented the impairment argument for the immorality of abortion, to which I responded and he has now replied. The argument is based on the premise that impairing a fetus with fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral, and on the principle that if impairing an organism is immora...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Blackshaw, Bruce P. (Author)
Contributors: Hendricks, Perry C. (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 211-213
IxTheo Classification:NCH Medical ethics
Further subjects:B impairment argument
B fetal alcohol syndrome
B Fetus
B Abortion
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727465970
003 DE-627
005 20220124120611.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200819s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12698  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727465970 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727465970 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Blackshaw, Bruce P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Perry Hendricks has recently presented the impairment argument for the immorality of abortion, to which I responded and he has now replied. The argument is based on the premise that impairing a fetus with fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral, and on the principle that if impairing an organism is immoral, impairing it to a higher degree is also—the impairment principle. If abortion impairs a fetus to a higher degree, then this principle entails abortion is immoral. In my reply, I argued that abortion does not impair an organism in the way fetal alcohol syndrome does, and showed that interest theorists can avoid the argument. Hendricks has responded to my criticisms by demonstrating how abortion does impair an organism. In this reply, I acknowledge Hendricks’ point, but proceed to criticize the application of the impairment principle to abortion, showing that it is invalid if we accept his explanation for why inflicting fetal alcohol syndrome is immoral. I also argue that counter-examples show the impairment principle itself to be dubitable, concluding that the impairment argument remains unpersuasive. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Abortion 
650 4 |a fetal alcohol syndrome 
650 4 |a Fetus 
650 4 |a impairment argument 
652 |a NCH 
700 1 |a Hendricks, Perry C.  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 34(2020), 2, Seite 211-213  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2020  |g number:2  |g pages:211-213 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Hendricks, Perry C.  |t (Regrettably) Abortion remains immoral  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)172750268X 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12698  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12698  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 34  |j 2020  |e 2  |h 211-213 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3741216240 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727465970 
LOK |0 005 20211005021608 
LOK |0 008 200819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Fetus,Foetus 
STB 0 0 |a Fœtus 
STC 0 0 |a Feto 
STD 0 0 |a Feto 
STE 0 0 |a 胎儿,胎 
STF 0 0 |a 胎兒,胎 
STG 0 0 |a Feto 
STH 0 0 |a Зародыш,Плод 
STI 0 0 |a Έμβρυο 
SYE 0 0 |a Fötus