RT Article
T1 Strong and Weak Teleology in the Life Sciences Post-Darwin
JF Religions
VO 11
IS 3
A1 Flannery, Michael A.
LA English
PB MDPI
YR 2020
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1727130782
AB It is often assumed that direction and purpose in nature—teleology—is a dead relic of the past, a result of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859) and Descent of Man (1871). But teleology has had a long and complex relationship with science. This paper will trace its general history with an emphasis upon the life sciences, especially biology. Particularly important is the fact that all teleology is not equal; strong (transcendent) teleology (designated Ts) should be distinguished from weak (purely descriptive and utilitarian) teleology (designated Tw). A working definition of teleology in its most meaningful aspects is then given. The challenges that Darwinism faced in dealing with purpose in nature are discussed, as is their proposed solution in the evolutionary synthesis, and the persistence of Ts following that synthesis is outlined and critiqued. Evidence of Ts persistence in the life sciences is presented with several relevant examples, and strong teleology is further differentiated by specific (Ts+) and nonspecific (Ts−) varieties. This essay concludes that Ts remains an ongoing and integral part of the life sciences and will likely remain so, even though it may be true but not verifiable empirically.
K1 Darwinism
K1 Edmund Ware Sinnott
K1 Lecomte du Noüy
K1 Michael Denton
K1 Pierre-Paul Grassé
K1 Evolution
K1 neo-Darwinian synthesis
K1 Teleology
K1 teleometry
K1 teleonomy
DO 10.3390/rel11060298