What Christian Environmental Ethics Can Learn from Stewardship’s Critics and Competitors

In this article I distill a trio of lessons for Christian environmental ethics from the stewardship model’s detractors and rivals. I begin by delineating stewardship and explaining the model’s initial prevalence as Christians’ primary response to widespread recognition of environmental crisis and th...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Simmons, Frederick V. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: [2020]
Dans: Studies in Christian ethics
Année: 2020, Volume: 33, Numéro: 4, Pages: 529-548
Classifications IxTheo:NBE Anthropologie
NCG Éthique de la création; Éthique environnementale
Sujets non-standardisés:B non-anthropocentrism
B Anthropocentrism
B land ethic
B Environmental Ethics
B Stewardship
B Cosmology
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1727038592
003 DE-627
005 20211021141413.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200814s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0953946819859513  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727038592 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727038592 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1124470212  |0 (DE-627)878177191  |0 (DE-576)482765887  |4 aut  |a Simmons, Frederick V. 
109 |a Simmons, Frederick V. 
245 1 0 |a What Christian Environmental Ethics Can Learn from Stewardship’s Critics and Competitors 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this article I distill a trio of lessons for Christian environmental ethics from the stewardship model’s detractors and rivals. I begin by delineating stewardship and explaining the model’s initial prevalence as Christians’ primary response to widespread recognition of environmental crisis and their faith’s alleged culpability for it. I then distinguish two waves of criticism that, by denouncing stewardship’s substance and method, thoroughly discredited the model among Christian ethicists. Yet, as stewardship was being rejected for its susceptibility to anthropocentrism, one of its chief competitors—the land ethic—was being repudiated for its liability to misanthropy. I argue that these developments give Christians cause to (1) affirm a hierarchical non-anthropocentrism that prioritizes human interests; (2) premise such priority in part on human embrace of non-anthropocentrism; and (3) interpret environmental ethics as more than a matter of models like stewardship. 
650 4 |a Anthropocentrism 
650 4 |a Cosmology 
650 4 |a Environmental Ethics 
650 4 |a land ethic 
650 4 |a non-anthropocentrism 
650 4 |a Stewardship 
652 |a NBE:NCG 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Studies in Christian ethics  |d London : Sage, 1988  |g 33(2020), 4, Seite 529-548  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)368910555  |w (DE-600)2118000-3  |w (DE-576)11946067X  |x 0953-9468  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2020  |g number:4  |g pages:529-548 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946819859513  |x Resolving-System 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3739904089 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727038592 
LOK |0 005 20211021141413 
LOK |0 008 200814||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052988  |a NCG 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw