What Christian Environmental Ethics Can Learn from Stewardship’s Critics and Competitors
In this article I distill a trio of lessons for Christian environmental ethics from the stewardship model’s detractors and rivals. I begin by delineating stewardship and explaining the model’s initial prevalence as Christians’ primary response to widespread recognition of environmental crisis and th...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Опубликовано: |
[2020]
|
В: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Год: 2020, Том: 33, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 529-548 |
Индексация IxTheo: | NBE Антропология NCG Экологическая этика; этика мироздания |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
non-anthropocentrism
B Anthropocentrism B land ethic B Environmental Ethics B Stewardship B Cosmology |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727038592 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211021141413.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200814s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0953946819859513 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727038592 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727038592 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1124470212 |0 (DE-627)878177191 |0 (DE-576)482765887 |4 aut |a Simmons, Frederick V. | |
109 | |a Simmons, Frederick V. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Christian Environmental Ethics Can Learn from Stewardship’s Critics and Competitors |
264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this article I distill a trio of lessons for Christian environmental ethics from the stewardship model’s detractors and rivals. I begin by delineating stewardship and explaining the model’s initial prevalence as Christians’ primary response to widespread recognition of environmental crisis and their faith’s alleged culpability for it. I then distinguish two waves of criticism that, by denouncing stewardship’s substance and method, thoroughly discredited the model among Christian ethicists. Yet, as stewardship was being rejected for its susceptibility to anthropocentrism, one of its chief competitors—the land ethic—was being repudiated for its liability to misanthropy. I argue that these developments give Christians cause to (1) affirm a hierarchical non-anthropocentrism that prioritizes human interests; (2) premise such priority in part on human embrace of non-anthropocentrism; and (3) interpret environmental ethics as more than a matter of models like stewardship. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Anthropocentrism | |
650 | 4 | |a Cosmology | |
650 | 4 | |a Environmental Ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a land ethic | |
650 | 4 | |a non-anthropocentrism | |
650 | 4 | |a Stewardship | |
652 | |a NBE:NCG | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in Christian ethics |d London : Sage, 1988 |g 33(2020), 4, Seite 529-548 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)368910555 |w (DE-600)2118000-3 |w (DE-576)11946067X |x 0953-9468 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g pages:529-548 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946819859513 |x Resolving-System |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3739904089 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727038592 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20211021141413 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200814||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052988 |a NCG | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |