Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation
It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justifie...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2020, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 290-302 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science HB Old Testament KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages NBC Doctrine of God NBD Doctrine of Creation VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
theistic naturalism
B Origins B Creation B Aquinas B Metaphysics B Causality |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1726936937 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240227123310.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200812s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14746700.2020.1755545 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1726936937 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1726936937 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hannon, Joseph |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a It has been argued that divine creation should be understood solely in a metaphysical and theological sense, and not within the context of modern cosmology and biology. In this way, any conflict between science and religion is totally avoided. William Carroll is a scholar of Aquinas who has justified this position, citing arguments made by Thomas, specifically that creation does not involve change. Here, I argue that this is a major distortion of Aquinas’ views and that the ontology of creation formulated is fundamentally incoherent. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 601 | |a Interpretation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Aquinas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theistic naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Causality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Creation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphysics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Origins | |
| 652 | |a CF:HB:KAE:NBC:NBD:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology and science |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 |g 18(2020), 2, Seite 290-302 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372546447 |w (DE-600)2124364-5 |w (DE-576)261325019 |x 1474-6719 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g pages:290-302 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Silva, Ignacio Alberto, 1978 - |t Thomas Aquinas and William E. Carroll on Creatio ex Nihilo: A Response to Joseph Hannon’s “Theological Objections to a Metaphysicalist Interpretation of Creation” |d 2021 |w (DE-627)1758732989 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2020.1755545 |x Resolving-System |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3738687203 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1726936937 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240925145825 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200812||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051531 |a NBD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044128 |a HB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144204389X |a CF | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||