Who speaks for nature? On the continued importance of the Bergson-Einstein debate
This article argues that efforts to understand the relationship of science and theology beyond the dichotomies of nature and culture might be aided by reconsidering the 20th c. debate between Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein. Rather than merely a contest over proper science or even the demarcation...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
[2020]
|
| Em: |
Theology and science
Ano: 2020, Volume: 18, Número: 1, Páginas: 137-151 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | CF Cristianismo ; Ciência TJ Idade Moderna TK Período contemporâneo VA Filosofia YA Natural sciences |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Einstein
B Nature B Bergson B theology and science B Metaphysics B Time |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Resumo: | This article argues that efforts to understand the relationship of science and theology beyond the dichotomies of nature and culture might be aided by reconsidering the 20th c. debate between Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein. Rather than merely a contest over proper science or even the demarcation of science and philosophy, I argue that the real issue in their debate was a question of continuing importance for the contemporary dialogue of science and theology, namely: what is the heart of nature, and who gets to speak for it? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2019.1710354 |
