Contradictions, Contextuality, and Conceptuality: Why Is It that Luther Is Not a Feminist?
It is the aim of this article to constructively discuss some of the feminist critique that has been raised against the sixteenth century reformer, Martin Luther, and concomitantly to demonstrate the complexity, and primarily liberal aspects, of his view of women. At its outset, the article points to...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
[2020]
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 2 |
Further subjects: | B
nuancing of concepts
B Martin Luther B contextualizing of texts B s / feminism B Lyndal Roper B Rosemary Radford Ruether |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1726101037 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200803164146.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200803s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel11020081 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1726101037 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1726101037 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Pedersen, Wiberg |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contradictions, Contextuality, and Conceptuality |b Why Is It that Luther Is Not a Feminist? |
264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a It is the aim of this article to constructively discuss some of the feminist critique that has been raised against the sixteenth century reformer, Martin Luther, and concomitantly to demonstrate the complexity, and primarily liberal aspects, of his view of women. At its outset, the article points to the fact that there are many different types of feminism, the biggest difference existing between constructivist and essentialist feminisms. Having placed myself as a constructivist feminist with a prophetic-liberating perspective, I ponder how feminism as an -ism can again earn the respect it seems to have lost in the wider academia. I suggest that feminists nuance their use of strong concepts when assessing historical texts, viewing the assessed texts against the backdrop of their historical context, and that feminists stop romanticizing the Middle Ages as a golden age for women. In this vein, I point to the problem that many feminists make unsubstantiated and counterfactual statements based on co-readings of different strands of Protestantism, and that they often uncritically repeat these statements. I problematize, first, the psycho-historian Lyndal Roper’s claim that Luther should have held some of the most misogynist formulations known, which is absurd against the backdrop of the misogyny found in the centuries before Luther, especially in medieval texts by the Dominicans /the Scholastics. Second, the claims of feminist theologian Rosemary R. Ruether’s that Luther, like Calvin, worsened the status of women, which are counterfactual. | ||
601 | |a Feminist | ||
650 | 4 | |a Lyndal Roper | |
650 | 4 | |a Martin Luther | |
650 | 4 | |a Rosemary Radford Ruether | |
650 | 4 | |a contextualizing of texts | |
650 | 4 | |a feminism/s | |
650 | 4 | |a nuancing of concepts | |
700 | 1 | |a Marie, Else |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 11(2020,2) Artikel 81 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |
856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/2/81/pdf?version=1583068267 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/2/81 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020081 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3735284078 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1726101037 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200803161925 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200803||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Lutherjahr,Lutherjahr,Lutherjahr,Lutherjahr,Lutherjahr |