Validation of an implicit instrument to assess God representations. Part 2: Associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and object-relational functioning
Results about associations between God representations and well-being/mental health can be questioned because they are predominantly based on studies with self-report instruments. There are no well-validated implicit measures of God representations. Therefore we developed the Apperception Test for G...
Authors: | ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal of spirituality in mental health
Year: 2020, Volume: 22, Issue: 3, Pages: 252-283 |
IxTheo Classification: | AE Psychology of religion AG Religious life; material religion NBC Doctrine of God ZD Psychology |
Further subjects: | B
God representations
B implicit measure B object relations B Mentalization B personality pathology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Summary: | Results about associations between God representations and well-being/mental health can be questioned because they are predominantly based on studies with self-report instruments. There are no well-validated implicit measures of God representations. Therefore we developed the Apperception Test for God Representations (ATGR). In a clinical (n = 75) and a nonclinical (n = 71) sample, we found patterns of associations of scales of the ATGR and of an explicit God representation measure with implicit and explicit measures of object-relational functioning that undergirded the validity of most ATGR scales. Differences in patterns of associations between patients and nonpatients could theoretically be explained by the concept mentalization. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1934-9645 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of spirituality in mental health
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/19349637.2019.1569490 |